Why does the United States support Israel so much?

Question

Why does it seem that the US is the only country that is hesitant to condem their actions? What is our actual history with this country?

Answer 1

Lebanon crisis an international conspiracy

The Israeli-Hezbollah conflict threatens to drag Syria, Iran and the US into a regional war.

As'ad AbuKhalil, author of Bin Laden, Islam, and America's New 'War on Terrorism' as well as The Battle for Saudi Arabia: Royalty, Fundamentalism, and Global Power, believes the recent violence is a symptom of an international conspiracy under way to enforce UN resolution 1559, which calls for the disarmament of militia groups in Lebanon - a reference to Hezbollah.

A professor of political science at California State University, Stanislaus, and visiting professor at the University of California at Berkeley, AbuKhalil just returned from Lebanon.

Aljazeera.net: Israel says its assault on Lebanon is in self-defence against Hezbollah's Katyusha rocket attacks and the capture of two of its soldiers.

Hezbollah says southern Lebanon has long been an area of conflict with Israel occupying Lebanese land and that it wants indirect negotiations to secure the release of its prisoners in Israeli jails. How did the situation deteriorate so rapidly and so violently?

As'ad AbuKhalil: This particular conflict, and Israel's act of aggression on Lebanon, did not take place in a vacuum, and Israel did not act in some spontaneous fashion.

Hezbollah did not surprise Israel with the capture of the two Israeli occupation soldiers. Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah has repeatedly warned that if Israel does not release its Lebanese prisoners, he will be compelled to take Israeli soldiers as bargaining chips.

And Israel has not been sitting idly by since its partial withdrawal from South Lebanon in 2000. It has not only continued to occupy parts of South Lebanon, but also has been violating Lebanese sovereignty, by air, sea, and land.

Israel has also been kidnapping innocent Lebanese citizens: fishermen and shepherds. And one fisherman from Tyre - my hometown - is still missing, and at least one shepherd was killed last year.

Furthermore, Israel has adamantly refused to give to Lebanon a map of the more than 400,000 land mines that it left behind in South Lebanon, and which continue to kill Lebanese children in the region.

The recent crisis, as the article in the Washington Post by Robin Wright pointed out yesterday, is an international/regional conspiracy to implement United Nations Security Council resolution 1559.

The groundwork for this aggression began with the work of Rafiq al-Hariri [the slain former Lebanese prime minister] in 2004, when he worked with the US and France to pass that resolution in the Security Council.

The plan has the full support of Israel and client Arab regimes of the US: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt. But it will not work, and Hezbollah will not lay down its arms.

If the Lebanese government, led by the Hariri camp, thinks that it can now convince Hezbollah to lay down its arms and to trust the Lebanese Army - which has been sitting idly over the last week - to take care of Lebanon's defence, it is wildly mistaken.

What are Israel's goals? What are Hezbollah's goals?

I think that Israel often acts in revenge. The Zionist movement is a vengeful movement; it always has been.

It wants not only to implement UNSC 1559 to disarm Hezbollah, but it also wants, as it did in 1982, to pave the way for the installation of American puppets as rulers of Lebanon. These plans never work: All grand plans for Lebanon strike the rocks of deep sectarian divisions in the country.

I think that Hezbollah started by wanting to achieve a prisoner exchange with Israel, and probably to ease the pressures on Palestine.

But now, they mostly and primarily want to retain possession of their weapons, and they have in that at least the overwhelming support of the Shia in Lebanon, the single largest sect in the country.

Dozens of civilians have been killed on both sides but there has been little movement in the international community. Is there a feeling that mediation or efforts to bring about a ceasefire will be fruitless?

The silence of the so-called international community, which has been under the control and in the service of the US government since the end of the Cold War, has been most painful for those in Lebanon who have been told in the last two years that the international community cares about Lebanon and its people. Now people know better.

I do believe that the same racist impulse that considers Israeli lives worth more than Arab lives is at play here. I have no doubt that the lives of Arabs never meant much for the descendants of colonial powers in the region.

And it is important that we don't allow Israeli propaganda to present an image of symmetry between the two sides: There is no symmetry between the two sides in this conflict.

Not only in terms of Israeli military superiority, but also in terms of massive killings by Israel of largely innocent civilians.

Do the Lebanese blame Hezbollah or Israel for this crisis?

I think that all Lebanese blame Israel for the killing and for the aggression. But the Saudi clients in Lebanon are trying to exploit the events to build up resentment against Hezbollah.

In Lebanon, there never are unified opinions on anything, and certainly the sectarian divisions do not amount to a unified stance behind Hezbollah.

There are many Lebanese who don't support the ideology of Hezbollah but who also believe that the party is now single-handedly defending Lebanon against savage Israeli aggression.

John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, implicated Iran and Syria as being at least partially to blame for supporting Hezbollah...

It is ironic to speak of John Bolton - the same person who was honoured a few months ago by the Hariri ruling coalition in Lebanon.

Yes, Hezbollah receives the support of Iran and Syria, just as the Hariri coalition receives the support of US, France, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, and possibly Israel indirectly.

Will Israel attack Syria or Iran next? Could this become an all-out regional war? Could this draw the US into the conflict?

It seems that Israel will avoid attacking Iran and Syria at this stage. With the Israeli war on Palestine still proceeding unabated, the Israelis may not find a need.

The US/EU/UN will deal with both countries, on behalf of Israel, through pressures and punitive measures.

But, if Syria and Iran come under attack, then all bets are off in the region, and US plans in Iraq will face more challenges and more subversion.

Iran has indirectly facilitated the US occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, and Syria has recently been co-operating with the US occupation in Iraq.

If attacked, both countries can easily make things worse for the US, and that explains the reluctance of the US in endorsing attacks on Iran or Syria.

With Iraq on the verge of civil war, how will the Lebanon crisis affect the region?

It depends on what happens. If Israel is permitted to continue in the aggression, Syria and Iran may feel threatened, and that may unleash their forces in Iraq against the US.

Under such circumstances, American troubles in the region will only increase. But no matter what happens, this carnage will have affects thoughout the Middle East.

Let us remember that the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon unleashed seismic changes and movements in the region, including the rise of Hamas and Hezbollah.

Those who think that when the dust settles, all will go back to normal, are people who have not read the contemporary history of the Middle East.

In the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict, this Israeli aggression will go down as a watershed; it will have an impact on the course of the conflict and also on the stability of the very regimes that the US spends money and weapons to prop up.

As the main power-broker in the Middle East, what role can the US play to end the violence?

You have to be either ignorant or foolish or both to consider the US interested in ending the current conflict. The US has clearly endorsed an unconditional Israeli aggression on Lebanon and Palestine. The US will leave it to Israel to decide not only the manner of killing of Arabs, but even to determine the number of Arabs that Israel wishes to kill.

Some Arab countries have criticised Hezbollah and its backers for the recent crisis but Iran and some fighters in Iraq have firmly stood by Hezbollah. Could we see a more extensive Shia-Sunni conflict on the sidelines of an Arab-Israeli war?

Yes, the Saudis have now officially endorsed a Shia-Sunni conflict in the Middle East. And this plan has the support of the US and Israel. This can easily, however, affect stability of several Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia. So trying to manipulate the Sunni-Shia divide is like playing with fire. We saw the fruits of American sectarian manipulation in Iraq.

How likely is the Lebanese government to survive the crisis?

The Hariri element of the ruling coalition will come out weaker as a result of this crisis. That seems certain. They will either be seen as incompetent, or as secret partners of the American/Israeli/Saudi plan for Lebanon.

But even at the humanitarian level, the Lebanese government has failed miserably in meeting the basic demands of the refugees.

In recent months, there was a general feeling that Lebanon had bounced back with major economic drive and a tourism boost. How do Lebanese look at their long-term prospects now that much of what they rebuilt has been destroyed?

The Lebanese have been through a lot - the people of south Lebanon have been through scores of savage Israeli invasions and campaigns of aggression. Not only are the people known for resilience, but their ability to reconstruct and resume normal life - as much as possible - has become well known.

But the funds needed for reconstruction will come at a high price: It will be like Hariri's accruement of foreign debt which further eroded the independence and sovereignty of Lebanon.

Answer 2

In the second World War, the major world superpowers set up governments in the Middle East. This was done because both the Axis and Allies needed resources people in the Middle East had. They were largely caught in the middle of a world at war and both sides were afraid the other would invade the Middle East first and have a huge resource advantage. Although just after the war, Israel happened to be one of the governments the U.S. set up, and it's as important today as it was then, for the same reasons. The only way the rest of the world can pull out of the Middle East and leave them alone again, is if it becomes dependent on something other than oil for energy. Even then, every country on Earth has made some powerful enemies in that part of the world, and pulling out of that region will be a slow and painful process some countries may not even view as being worth it. The Middle East also needs to be able to trade to survive, which means they will need to make peace with technologically advanced nations such as India in order to survive in a world where oil isn't worth very much and the words "global economy" actually mean something. There is always a benefit to trading with another country that does something well even if you already do it well, and some of the world's most popular programming languages came out of the Middle East, so there is hope. Until all that happens, the U.S. is going to continue supporting Israel, for the same reason every other first world country continues supporting at least one Middle Eastern nation. In a sentence, we side with them because it's in our best interest.

Answer 3

Because the people of Israel gowerns the United States

Answer 4

Hey,
To download for free World in Conflict Soviet Assault you can click here: http://bit.ly/Y2PQ4O

it's the full version, avaiable for free! very fast to install
You have the option to play in the solo scenario or engage in multiplayer combats. Up to 15 players can fight against.
You should definitely try it

Answer 5

Probably the most salient point is that Israel was the only democracy in the entire region for more than half a century. Add to this the fact that Israel has been attacked on several occasions in its history, often by several of its neighbors simultaneously, and those neighbors were generally client-states of the Soviets during the Cold War; it becomes easy to see why we would tend to support Israel generally. In the current crisis, Israel is more clearly in line with international law than it has been in a long time, so they would be due our support at present even if we didn't have a long history of cooperation with them.

Answer 6

It is interesting that a significant number of people here question the support for israel.

Israel has been our primary friend in the middle East since World War II and I can't see the United States leaving them alone now when they are in a sea of enemy States which are intent on eliminating Israel.

Then too, if the United States left Israel on its own, it is quite likely that they could be pushed to the wall with no choice but to use their nuclear weapons to save themselves. If that occurred, the rest of the middle East would be turned to glass.

Answer 7

For the longest time between 1950 and 1990, Israel was the only democracy in the Middle East. The rest were third world countries that had neither democracy or communism and so represented possible enemies if they chose communism over democracy when either us or the Soviet Union forced the choice on them. We allied with Israel during this time to assist in fending off the Soviet Union.

We support them now because they are the lead target (even above us) for the terrorist and so they are willing to help America fight them if only to protect themselves.

Answer 8

6 million jews were murdered by Hitler in World War II in the concentration camps.

After the war, the country of Israel was established as a homeland for jews. Why Israel? Because 2000 years ago that's where jews lived before arabs invaded and scattered jews across the globe.

It's been difficult for Israel to survive because it is surrounded by Arab countries which constantly attack it.

We depend on oil for our country, the USA, to survive. Arab countries possess most of the world's oil. Israel is a true friend of the US that is located in the middle of the oil region and has nuclear weapons.

If Israel falls, the Arabs will be able to cut off the flow of oil to the USA and the US will fall. That's why we support Israel.

Answer 9

We stood by while millions of Jews were killed by Nazis. There has been a lot of sympathy for that. Also the Jews represent the religion that Christianity was founded on so there has been that relationship too.

Strategically they are an important ally in the middle east. We have a major cia listening post in Tel Aviv. Saddam tried to missile it in the gulf war. It is an optimum place to monitor and balance things. Israel also has numerous nukes we supplied them with. They will be in conflict with Muslim countries so it kind of keeps things in check. They are very useful to us in that region.

Answer 10

i was reading an article today about how the recent rocket attacks in israel have somehow compromised israel's longstanding practice of attacking its enemies in other countries before they could launch attacks within israel itself.

this seems to be one of the reasons we would support israel - to keep the terrorists focused over there.

of course, there's also the lil thing called "backing up your allies" that we tend to do when it's politically expedient.

we also have a sizeable portion of guilt (i think) over not doing anything about stopping the atrocities committed against the jews throughout europe in the 1930s and 1940s. even though there were tons of reports before and during WWII about how the jews were being treated we (meaning our gov't and most private citizens) didn't really believe it or didn't really think it was our place to interfere.

Answer 11

The jewish lobby. And they need a springboard in that region.