watching the news right now, and the CNN and MSNBC are using terms like these: "Iran and Syria ACCUSED (my emphasis) of providing over 13,000 missiles".
ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!
Nobody is accusing Iran and Syria. Accusing connotes the possibility that the charge could be wrong, that the accused can prove its innocence.
There is no ACCUSING. It is a FACT!!!!!!!!
The headline should be "Iran and Syria SUPPLYING 13,000 missiles to be launched at civilians inside Israel. Not at military or strategic targets, but against civilians".
Liberals, you are really pathetic.
2006-07-18 01:09:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
WMD - Not very informed are you. Please research some more and you will find the truth. LOL
2006-07-18 01:13:48 · update #1
Me, propaganda? Hahahaha.
Yeah, Hezbollah has the money to afford all of the weapons that it is using to kill civilians.
*sigh* I'm sorrounded by imbiciles, morons, traitors, and worse, liberals that can vote
2006-07-18 01:15:46 · update #2
the liberal is neither liberal or conservative? Google the Yale study that asserts that the media is strongly liberal. Not that it leans liberal, IT IS LIBERAL.
2006-07-18 01:16:51 · update #3
But didn't you know that only Bush, Cheney, the Republicans, the military and conservatives are guilty of any and every charge leveled against them?
Terrorists, marxists and Democrats (there's a triple redundancy!) are not guilty of anything, even if they do it on live TV.
2006-07-18 01:15:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Why can't the liberal media and news tell the truth" translates to:
"Why does any media tell the truth? It keeps getting in the way of our fantasy that we're all living in heaven and everything is oh-so-perfect."
The truth equals reality, and that's the one thing that you conservatives have a really serious issue with.
Remember that horrible feeling when you were all cozy in bed and having a nice dream when you were a little kid, and then your dad or mom woke you up and you were so upset that you cried? How would you like to be a conservative and have that feeling persist for eighty straight years?
No wonder they're such wretched bastards.
All these Bush-heads seem to conveniently forget that from November 7th, 2000, until last year when Bush's five years of never-ending lies finally caught up to him, no president had ever seen a more friendly media. Now that pretty well everybody sees Bush is a complete phony and hypocrite, if not an outright imbecile, all his little fan clubbers want to cry and blame it all on the mean, bad old media. The same media that gave Bush the presidency and kept it for him for five years.
It must be really hard to still be a Bush fan... it's like a cross between still believing in Santa Claus and buying lifeboats for the Titanic.
2006-07-18 08:31:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media obviously has an agenda. It's impossible to deny this. You would have to be living under a rock with your head in the sand to not see it.
Also know that the main agenda of the media is to bring down Bush, so anything that shows GW in any kind of favorable light is strictly forbidden or spun with a negative twist. So if Bush declares that we stand with our Israeli allies, then the directive of the media is to make Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Palestinians out to be the poor, pitiful weak innocents that have done nothing to provoke this horrible assault.
And it's true-liberals are pathetic.
2006-07-18 08:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media is neither liberal or conservative. This is just a convenient excuse for partisan politicians to affect the way news is reported to suit their needs.
There are enough news outlets of varying quality that there is no reason why anyone should feel politically slighted. It's a cop out for the weak minded sheep who follow political masters on both sides of the aisle.
Sheep.
2006-07-18 08:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by sincityq 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The New York Times wants a smaller piece of the pie. They are tired of shouldering the yellow jersey of journalism and they want someone else to take the lead. After all, it is far easier to sit at your desk and make up a story than it is to get your fat *** out of the chair and go get the facts. To get facts you have to actually talk to another human being and that can be a frightening experience.
2006-07-18 10:51:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the media has such a liberal agenda why don't the conservative companies that own them do something about it?
It's not that the media is liberal, if anything the media is cowardly and lazy. And NO, liberals and lazy cowards are not the same thing.
2006-07-18 08:34:59 · answer #6 · answered by scott j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives always whine about the liberal media...Why didn't you go into journalism so your voice could be heard??? Wasn't any money in it, huh? Pharmie Rush made out pretty good... Although he needs to be on drugs to believe what he says.
2006-07-18 08:16:32 · answer #7 · answered by bklyngirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Media is owned and controlled by Jews. It is in their interests to mislead the masses of Christian Americans.
Now they want a war with Iran.
Existence impels the Jew to lie, and to lie perpetually...
2006-07-18 08:34:41 · answer #8 · answered by Shredder 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ISRAEL is responding to attacks with U.S. made missles and tanks anti personel mines have been eastablished to secure the borders provided by the U.S..
ATTACK HELICOPTERS patrol the borders and and fighter planes target hezballah strong holds provided by the U.S . .
IS this the kind of media news you would like reported fair and balanced.
2006-07-18 08:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes in order to get to a level of a story, especially one to get read by many people, they have a policy that in some cases allows for "white lies" or worse.
2006-07-18 08:13:56 · answer #10 · answered by wn05641a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋