do u agree that wwe was at its best part from the late 2002-restlemania
2006-07-18 00:53:37 · 13 answers · asked by trevor 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
yes i do
2006-07-18 00:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by kaz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think WWE was best from 1996-2002. After that with the brands splitting and people like john cena and batista getting on top, really brought wwe downhill alot.
2006-07-18 06:42:12 · answer #2 · answered by ledzkreep 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, WWE was the best during the Mania era. It still had the aire of legitmate sport but had plent of zany charachters and storylines. This dicotomy, of percieved reality and bombastic spectacle made for great viewing. C'mon Hulk Hogan at his peak? Machomadness in full gear? For me Wrestlemania 5 and the "Megapowers Collide" was the best it will ever get in WWE history.
2006-07-18 00:57:42 · answer #3 · answered by Bubba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-07-18 04:59:52 · answer #4 · answered by WrizzLe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd say mid to late 90's was WWE's best time, because they had big competition in the form of WCW, which forced them to be more creative.
2006-07-18 03:04:15 · answer #5 · answered by d_outlaw3 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-07-18 01:04:27 · answer #6 · answered by hemant kumawat 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree
2006-07-18 00:59:20 · answer #7 · answered by lizzzypinky 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOPE wrestlemaina 23 YAY!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-18 05:22:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i do
2006-07-18 01:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by blue rose 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't.. I think it was at it's best when it didn't exist..
2006-07-18 00:56:33 · answer #10 · answered by LokoLobo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋