I'm sure during Hilter's reign people the world over did not think he was an insane murderous monster either. That's why millions of Germans followed him and those people are now ashamed of it. Today they publically distance themselves from his propaganda. I see the Bush era in the same way.
2006-07-18 00:03:33 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
i allready see him that way.
israel is now copying his style.
2006-07-18 00:31:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
History is all in who writes it... In the arab world hilter is one of their greatest heros... and will remain that way for a long time to come.
Had hilter won he'd be talked about as the greatest leader the world know.
He didn't win and thus he isn't. Just because you view something today without any facts which history will prove 75 years down the road doesn't make your view true.
Bush will be judged on what is not only writed what has really happened... if suddenly iraq and the whole middle east stop fighting and on go free election... well that bush will be credited with saving the world.... if everything goes into the crap then he will be view dimly.
2006-07-18 07:12:31 · answer #2 · answered by rdfrobo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Hitler directly ordered the murder of millions of people. Bush is easily the worst President of my lifetime, and one of the worst ever, but he killed at most about 100,000 people (and it's almost certainly FAR less than that), and clearly didn't do so with the intent to murder them. He did not order their murders, and certainly believed that the actions that resulted in their deaths were necessary to the security of the United States. He is not nearly the monster that Hitler was, and while he should be remembered for having made the most serious U.S. foreign policy mistake ever, there's no way he should be remembered as another Hitler.
You might do better to direct your anger towards those among his followers who really DO have Hitler-like motivations. It's not too difficult to find people who believe that the U.S. actions in Iraq are a Christian war against Islam, and who think that the U.S. is a Christian nation that SHOULD be at war against Islam. Any action taken on that basis is of course treason, and is morally indistinguishable from Nazism. Bush does bear some responsibility for this, as his party openly courts the support of those people and has therefore dramatically strengthened that particular brand of anti-Americanism. But Bush is most definitely not a leader of that movement.
2006-07-18 07:31:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Get over your George Bush is Satan fetish and grow up.
The fact that you are comparing Bush to someone who systematically killed 11 million people for no other reason than he considered them "inferior" is insane. Where do you get this stuff from? Do you believe everything you see on TV? Wait, I don't even think TV reporters are this crazy. Start getting some new friends because you're getting nothing but crap from the ones you have now.
2006-07-18 07:19:26 · answer #4 · answered by Ellen J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The libs will be seen in the same light as the Nazi sympathizers.
2006-07-18 07:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by mad_mav70 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No truer words have ever been spoken - well done !
2006-07-18 07:07:10 · answer #6 · answered by pratchmg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I AGREE FULLY...
2006-07-18 07:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by MAGNUM 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋