how come pathan was dropped from the test matches...y is he the last choice boler....i feel sresanth is far behind pathan...
2006-07-17 22:53:12 · 8 answers · asked by i_love_inzi 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
no ofcorse not...sreesanth is not even a good bowler...pathan is atleast a better rcognized bowler...sreesanth should b dropped....balaji is better than sreesanth
2006-07-17 23:03:47 · answer #1 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No not at all.
Though Sreesanth bowls faster than Pathan, it is the accuracy need which is in Pathan.
"Speed hits the target only if it is bowled accurately but accuracy hits the target irrespective of the speed".
In the batting department also Pathan is far ahead of Sreesanth. In batting Pathan is a trump card that a captain can use in any position and he can deliver his best.
Pathan should be given more priority than Sreesanth in the series against Windies.
Hope for the best for the future series.
2006-07-18 07:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by Sherlock Holmes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Sreesanth is a better bowler than Pathan. He thinks be4 every ball he balls which Pathan doesnt. Pathan is a better batsman though. Pathan is being forced 2 prove that he is an allrounder which i think is hampering his bowling.
2006-07-18 00:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by PrAt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pathan is the good bowler in the indian cricket team after the kapildev and he is the best bastsman in the allrounders team after the shaunpollock from the south africa and flintoff from the england more than sreeshanth pathan will do swing and he will control the ball but sreeshanth will not keep the ball in the grip
2006-07-17 23:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Sreeesanth bowls good, but Pathan better.
Sreesanth is in form but Pathan is out of form.
2006-07-17 22:59:29 · answer #5 · answered by DPC 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no even though he played well we can't say he is better than pathan may be he can come to that place in future
2006-07-17 23:04:12 · answer #6 · answered by Harry Potter 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i think yes he is better than pathan.do u know the average speed of pathan ?125 km/h thats what shahid afridi bowls.and he can only take wickets on bowlers paradise pitches.whereas shreeshant average speed is 140 km/h.and he can also take wickets on rough surface.
2006-07-17 23:07:09 · answer #7 · answered by blader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a big noooooooooooooo!!!!
2006-07-18 05:26:28 · answer #8 · answered by faraz_therock 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋