Anyways, anybody else wish this would happen so we could FINALLY see an impeachment like with Clinton?
Since Bush has lied to congress a heck of a lot more than Clinton, this ..... is all that is missing.
2006-07-17 19:56:50 · 13 answers · asked by BeachBum 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yeah Kathy, what are you doing here? LOL
2006-07-17 20:02:51 · update #1
Mortis here is your 100% proof Bush has repeatedly lied to congress. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/
2006-07-17 20:03:56 · update #2
In case any self-admitted bimbos, like Kathy, aren't getting the question. The point is: since Bush has lied repeatedly (a lot more than Clinton) to congress then all that is missing that would justify impeachment is the Monica act. I mean is that what else republicans need? Is that what they are waiting on? Get it?
2006-07-17 20:07:28 · update #3
woo hoo we have another winner!!! lol Trouble congratulations on winning idiot in denial award #2.
2006-07-17 21:48:48 · update #4
I would mind when Clinton was in office things were a lot better than it is now. That's why I didn't understand why people voted for him again. Do we like to killed off for the Bush sake. So what if Clinton got layed by younger women good for him so he won't be so up tight.
2006-07-17 20:14:41 · answer #1 · answered by Faith 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Wow I didn't fully understand how stupid republicans were until reading these people. BBum, I get it and agree with ya. I've seen that Frontline show too by the way. The problem I have is that republicans still say to give them proof he lied then when they have the proof right in their face with a line of witnesses testifying about it, they probably don't even to look at it.
You're right on target. If he was Clinton, he would have been impeached a long time ago. Repubicans always have an excuse and double standard for their own.
2006-07-18 03:25:27 · answer #2 · answered by Answers R Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mortis is correct - the impeachment related to lying to a Grand Jury - not to the relationship with Monica.
2006-07-18 03:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'd think hes already done enough to get impeached, wouldn't you. Clinton just banged a girl with a cigar, Bush started a war for no reason.
2006-07-18 02:58:46 · answer #4 · answered by The Chucksta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?? It didnt work with Clinton...
personally I was hoping Hillary would beat the stuffing out of Monica on Pay-per-view..
so you think Bush lied to congress huh??
every time Billy Boy opened his festering gob he was lying ........
2006-07-18 03:05:00 · answer #5 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but your going to have to do better than that lame a s s link.
I think Kathy's right.
Maybe someone should do that "Monica/Clinton thing" with you.
You need to check your facts missy.
2006-07-18 03:54:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you have absolute proof that President Bush has lied under oath to a Grand Jury?
If so, start the articles of impeachment.
Just be ready for when President Cheney is in charge.
*edit*
Thanks for your link. However, most of it is now crap. Unless you believe Joe Wilson about his trip to Niger.
2006-07-18 02:59:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mortis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe Clinton was doing that with Monica. I wonder how many other presidents were & are doing the same thing. What hipocrates! They also go to church with their families.
2006-07-18 03:02:18 · answer #8 · answered by Ivy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that a question? Wish someone weren't an idiot so I could save some brain cells
2006-07-18 02:58:37 · answer #9 · answered by BidDogARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRFf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must elaborate on that. I hope that you have a reason...or some basis for the accusation. Good luck.
2006-07-18 03:02:13 · answer #10 · answered by Christopher D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋