What grade would you give Bush on his war on terror.?

Question

I would give a D+ and nothing better. We did nail a few bad apples in Iraq. We did take out the Taliban. Some plots were thwarted here though most were way over hyped, but not all.

But trying to give our ports over to country's linked to terrorism was crazy.

Taking most of our resources and man power to get Saddam and not getting Bin Laden is stupid.

Saying "he didn't care about Bin Laden and he doesn't cross my mind" was a slap in the face of America.

Diverting money from high risk terrorist targets to other targets like a mule, a hick town with a population of under 8,000 and a popcorn factory (not making this up) was mind boggling.

By not even trying to destroy Hamas or Hezbollah which experts agree have killed more Americans then Al-Qaeda and both gulf wars combined.

Using scare tactics to over hype the job he's doing and scaring us out of our freedoms (check out this video it's funny as hell).
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/270606sevenretards.htm

As of right now it sounds like most of you people hate Bush. So far his average grad is e-.

To Driver.

I did serve in the first gulf war. U.S.M.C all the way, and several of my family members serve right now. And the only women and children thanking them have bombs strapped to their waist.

And that carnage from those moron terrorist's actually didn't happen until Bush came in the picture.

And using guilt trips doesn't work anymore, people don't buy that. They don't buy the move to another country. That only works for people who bad mouth America not Bush, but hey nice try (or the Blame Clinton because Bush is an idiot) routine.

And if you are such an expert then you can move to another country. Try Iraq, maybe you'll find those WMD's. While your their you can give Halliburton a hand.

And don't bother asking us to bail your *** out. Though I have this feeling you'll be to busy looking for WMD's. Maybe if were lucky one will blow up in your face. Then you'll just blame Clinton.

Answer 1

i'd give him an F- even though it was him who sent all those troops out there it wasnt him who was fighting. it wasnt Bush who is out there risking his life for ideas that he doesnt agree with.. if he wants this war so bad then he should be out there on the front lines because it all seems so senseless and hes just pissing the rest of the world off. instead of worrying about the oil and all that he can profit off he should be worried about our allies he should be trying to create a stronger alliance with them, the world hates us. and soon we'll have no one to have our back if Bush keeps going this way.

Answer 2

What is better than A+? That is the grade. Do you want to go back to Clinton who did nothing??

Let me ask you this since you know so much about Military operations. Have you ever served? Have you even been in charge of others on a mission? Have you been to these theater's of the campaign? Until you have been there, until you can "truly" prove no weapons, until you can prove there are no more threats to this country you have no basis.

Have you been there when a woman along with her mother and her daughters who was raped and beaten in front of her husband and sons comes to you thanking you for setting them free?? Have you seen the carnage from the terrorists? If you have no experience, you have no room to voice an opinion. If you have such a bad life here, please move out of this country and go experience life in those great countries. Oh by the way, once there do not come asking us to help you.

Answer 3

I'm obviously not going to receive best anser but how many terroists attacks have we had on American soil sinc e 9/11 and how many have been diverted?

I'm not here to argue but Clinton was insisting on invading Iraq when they kicked out the inspectors when enough anthrax was found to kill the world 12 times over.His advisors wouldnt allow it due to him losing his popularity so he left it up to the next regime.

As noted by 60 minutes, in the 90s warehouses were built throughout the USA with anthrax vaccines ect and Clinton even stated terrorist attacks were inevitable. Most politicans, included Kerry knew these facts and is why they supported the war.

We are put into an inevitable, undesired situation by the "crazy people" of the world, and it's getting more serious than you realize.

I would give him an A- only because we had Osama cornered and he got away.

Answer 4

On one hand, Osama Bin Laden is still at large, Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and North Korea are still churning out terrorists and/or threatening America outright, and the intelligence community is still in the middle of a running retrofit, so we have no earthly idea where certain people or materials are.

On the other hand, there have been no major strikes on US soil in almost 5 years, Afghanistan and Iraq have been dealt with and are mostly taken care of, Israel is beginning to mobilize against Hezbollah, Lebanon and the Palestinians, and we have created a flashpoint in the terrorists' own backyard to distract them from fighting here.

Overall, 6.5/10 If Bin Laden is captured and/or one or more of the above offenders is successfully invaded and overthrown, 8.5/10

Answer 5

A+... I believe in taking the fight to my enemy, as Bush has done. Anyone who disagrees can stop calling himself a Marine. Why wait until the enemy is in your backyard to confront them? Once their intention is made clear take the fight to them.

Taking the fight to them on multiple fronts divides them and focuses their energy, money, and resources away from the US. Only the most naive people don't understand this simple fact.

Hamas and Hezbollah have killed 241 marines and about a dozen US citizens... Al-Qaeda killed over 2800 american citizens in one day... do you both with facts or just make up the bovine scatology that you spread so thick.

And FYI, the reason FEMA grants are going to non metropolitan areas and into rural areas is so if an urban area is hit by a terrorist attack there will be remote resources to call up.

Answer 6

F

So we are clear on this historically:

Invading Iraq was a mistake…

… and then, invading Iraq with too few troops was a mistake.

…and then, invading Iraq and standing by as the Iraqi people looted and destroyed their infrastructure and while lawlessness took over their country was a mistake.

… and then, throwing out all of the 50,000 Iraqi intelligence officers (instead of only the criminals) and not using them for what they were trained for (spying) was a mistake.

…and then, not capitalizing on the initial popularity of Prime Minister-designate Iyad Allawi was a mistake.

…and then, allowing the insurgents to methodically take over region after region in Iraq during our elections (so fewer troops would be killed) was a mistake.

***THAT*** is how we got caught up in this fuked-up mess in Iraq.

And just so we’re clear on this historically; it is not because of the ‘tree hugging’ protestors, it is not because of some latte sipping college professor, it is not because of John Kerry or Bill Clinton, and it is not because of the ‘liberal’ media:

It is because of policies put forth by a shockingly incompetent George W. Bush administration.

** F **

Answer 7

GRADE. . . GRADE????? B***, Chen**, and R***field should have all been brought up on war crimes against Iraq as well as the U.S. not to mention the lying. Wolf**itz along with a lot of this administrations other cronies have had a hard on for war with Iraq since 1997 (see PNAC).

They sent our brave young men and women into a country to start a war for their agenda. Now that everyone's pockets seem to have been filled to the brim, they have to get the people of the U.S. to believe them regarding the "axis of evil."

To get the full truth regarding 9/11, the neverending war on terror, as well as what the Hell they have done behind closed doors, I feel that Bu**'s closest advisors and cabinet members should have all been sent to Egypt or even Saudi Arabia for questioning. The Egyptians and/or Saudis seem to have some kind of technique that works really well. I think it is called . . . TORTURE.

Answer 8

F because in the process of taking out those 'bad apples' as you put it, Bush's cowboy diplomacy has only accomplished 3 things:
1. Alienated us from the rest of the world
2. Justified other countries and allies, like Israel, in their use of excessive force when attacked.
3. Created so many new terrorists in this process that I don't believe this war on terror will ever end until the end of mankind on earth.

Answer 9

What grade would you give the:

FAILED 5.3 TRILLION DOLLAR WAR ON POVERTY headed by none other then the liberals!
Don't get me wrong, I have the most sympathy for the poor and homeless, but the poverty rate has actually increased in the United States by nearly 25% since the War on Poverty was introduced.
WHERE IS THE EXIT STRATEGY ON THE BIGGEST FAILED WAR IN HISTORY? The United Way is much better at helping the poor than the government.

Answer 10

A+, Bush is the man, anyone who can find those sneaky b*tches is a great man. Kerry would've just said, okay get everyone out of there lets have peace and us Americans will just let you terrorize our country. Bush is not only going after the terrorists going at us, he's going after the terrorists of others too. GO BUSH!!!

Answer 11

Considering we have numb-nuts like you living on our precious land, I'd give him 4 Clinton thumbs-up. Yah, those two women put him in an awful situation that will take a "few" more presidents to straighten out.
Israel is one of our strongest allies-they are stronger than us-because they don't listen to crybaby democrats like you-they just do it. Do what needs to be done, regardless of international wusses like France and Russia, who have only words but run their crap underground. Either side with America the "brave", or become an Arab whore!!