English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

after the incident with Bush and Tony Blair open mike fiasco ~ I thought I'd pose that question.

2006-07-17 16:15:30 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

32 answers

So he slipped while talking to a colleague. Who hasn't? Golly, who even really cares.
Now interns on kneepads in the Oral, I mean Oval Office...that's disrespecting the office to which we had entrusted him...and he was getting paid via our tax dollars while doing it.
Anyway, only those who have never dropped the f bomb (or in this case, the poop word) can even think of criticizing him.

2006-07-17 16:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by LastNerveLost 3 · 1 2

Considering what the cursing president has accomplished - nothing of substance - I'll take the one that screws around any time. At least he didn't have us in a meaningless war and figure out countless ways to screw the American people. All he screwed was Monica - which proves his taste in younger women isn't all that great!

2006-07-17 16:25:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Bush goes on national Television and wags his finger at us all saying that he did not say what he said then I'd pick Bush.

This is more like a gaffaw than a fiasco......

2006-07-17 16:21:21 · answer #3 · answered by ibrouter 3 · 0 0

silly questioner.....clinton probably swore like a sailor. a more legitimate question would have been:

Would you rather have a president who lied about the reasons for invading a sovereign nation, or one who gets caught in an affair with an intern?

2006-07-17 16:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 0 0

Fiasco??? Hardly. At least with Clinton, we had both in a single person. Why not quote Clinton's mike gaffes.

2006-07-17 16:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by gtoacp 5 · 0 0

i would rather want a president who doesn't invade countries on a premise of lies.... i would rather want a president who uses his "religion" for salvation and not political gain..... I would rather want a president who makes his decisions based on fact..... and not his discussions with Jesus Christ!!!!

what Clinton did with an intern was between he and his wife.... and as you say bush cursing for the world to hear.... really makes America look worse than it already does.... which is really BAD!!!!!

2006-07-17 16:22:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sex is private and all men would do it if they knew they could get away with it. I think Republicans paid Monica off otherwise why would she even tell anyone if she really cared about him . Bush is just an idiot that no woman thinks is good looking !

2006-07-17 16:59:23 · answer #7 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0 0

The interesting thing is that how I would answer your question is different than how I would answer if I were asked if I liked Clinton or Bush II better.

2006-07-17 16:20:34 · answer #8 · answered by Mention the flag of St David 3 · 0 0

I fail to see how the two are comparable. Getting caught on record during some private chats is somewhat different from being impeached for suspected sexual misconduct.

I can't tell you which one is better or worse.

2006-07-17 16:17:52 · answer #9 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 0 0

either way after all the things Bush has done i think that this is the last thing that should be called a "fiasco"

2006-07-17 16:17:10 · answer #10 · answered by RATM 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers