Were they giving the Africans experimental drugs to see what would happen, or were they intentionally infecting them through drugs?
(I hate those films that jump around so much that you can't figure out the plot.)
2006-07-17 14:27:35 · 6 answers · asked by Me-as-a-Tree 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
They were testing, and it didn't go so well.
2006-07-17 14:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They were capitalizing on the AIDS epidemic in Africa. They used drugs that had the same potency and property as pesticides. The pharmaceutical company didn't have a cure for anything. They were just getting people to buy their stuff so they could make money. The goal was to have the world look at their company and be amazed by its supposed humanitarian ways. They tried to paint a good name and picture of themselves so they could dominate and prosper. Kind of like what's going on in reality.
2006-07-17 14:37:00 · answer #2 · answered by B-Truth 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They were testing drugs on the african's saying it was something else. I believe they called it "BumbleBee."
Yeah, that movie jumped around alot. I know there was a couple times I got lost in the theatre on what exactly was going on.
2006-07-17 14:31:18 · answer #3 · answered by Justin 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Using African villagers as lab rats for test their drug, without their knowledge.
2006-07-17 14:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by Dale P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were intentionally infecting the inhabitants of the refugee camps so that they could test the medicines.
2006-07-17 16:04:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never did get that movie - guess the book was better.
2006-07-17 14:48:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋