or your pet, or livestock?
2006-07-17 12:41:08 · 12 answers · asked by toota956 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Pets, yes.
Humans, no.
2006-07-17 12:46:49 · answer #1 · answered by Specious λ Neurotica 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Self or family no. Pet or livestock-- possibly yes.
2006-07-17 19:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are we really going to have a choice? They already can track us by GPS, which is on every cellphone, the strips in money. They have access to or computers and telephone conversations, banking records, so what's the big deal about having a chip in our body ?
We have nothing to fear but fear itself.............
2006-07-17 19:51:47 · answer #3 · answered by rascal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that would depend on the reason for doing it,however,if it were government recommended,i would refuse.my dog does have a microchip,in case is ever lost or taken,it will give me some hope of getting him back.
2006-07-17 20:27:07 · answer #4 · answered by deerwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would consider it if it only contained identity and medical information, but not if in any way it could be used to track where you were or what you were doing by scanning devices in your proximity.
2006-07-17 19:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by Dale P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. But I bet that some time in the future everyone will let it be done.
2006-07-17 19:50:32 · answer #6 · answered by jdm003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not in a million years
2006-07-17 19:45:47 · answer #7 · answered by Abraham 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, (all of the above)
2006-07-17 20:14:13 · answer #8 · answered by WhiteHat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, you already do, don't you,.. with dogs..
I would, if a person with Altzheimers got lost or something.
2006-07-17 19:45:16 · answer #9 · answered by cutezy.jazz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the mark of the beast?
2006-07-17 19:51:07 · answer #10 · answered by soperson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋