English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Zionism call for a racial state for the Jews and the old Afrikaans in South Africa called for a racial state for whites.Both Israel and the Afrikaans conducted harsh policies against the natives
Townships with high fences to control the native’s movement in the country.
Israel is building high wall to control the native people.Both countries use the natives as cheap labors and control their movement by permit cards to the workers.Both countries conducted collective punishment against natives when an individual acts against the state his Township or Refugee camp will be punished for his act.Both countries conducted collective punishment against natives when an individual acts against the state his Township or Refugee camp will be punished for his act.Both countries have limited international diplomatic relation with other countries.Both countries posses WMD
Both countries refused UN nations Resolutions.Both countries got support from the same racist societies in the world.

2006-07-17 12:36:06 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

The new Free South Africa granted the Palestinian government a full recognition and was one of the best countries who stood beside the Palestinian on the issue of Israel new wall in World Court of Justice
Today South Africa for all the people of South Africa
Tomorrow

One man one vote soon in the Holy Land.
like it or not

2006-07-17 12:45:54 · update #1

http://www.nkusa.org/
Zionists and racists claim that the Ancient Jews who lived in the Holy Land 3000 years were their ancestors while they deny the contemporary Palestinian people the right to claim their antecessors the Ancient Palestinian People
Palestine was the name of the Holy Land from the Roman time up to now

2006-07-17 12:55:29 · update #2

6 answers

think!!!! i am pretty sure damn it.

2006-07-17 12:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by mmohiedinn 2 · 0 0

The Israeli's have as much right to defend their land as I am sure you feel you do. After all, aren't you able to live on the property you do because of the fact that we invaded this country, displaced the native inhabitants and/or used them as cheap labor to build up our industry? Don't we still use citizens from other countries as cheap labor to strengthen ours.

The question is, if Mexican soldiers invaded our country, kidnapped two of our sons while killing others, and then demanded a insanely large ransom - what would be our justified reaction?

2006-07-17 12:42:07 · answer #2 · answered by Christopher B 6 · 0 0

Apartheid is no longer the equipment of government in SA. additionally the Afrikaners don't have a protection stress that could desire to heavily oppose the state, as replace into shown whilst they tried an revolt during the handover of potential.

2016-11-02 06:04:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Of course not. This is a really crazy anti-Semitic slur that's popular now.

It's not only an insult to Jews, but also to black South Africans who actually did suffer under an apartheid social system.

2006-07-17 21:03:49 · answer #4 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 0 0

No. Israel isn't the one that started this whole thing. It was the Palestinians who want to take away what is rightfully Israel's.

2006-07-17 12:42:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No- totally different circumstances.

2006-07-17 12:42:12 · answer #6 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers