how did the big bang happen if there was no matter existing to explode? also, how did the explosion become so big that it created the universe? (i am not trying to attack the big bang theory btw)
2006-07-17
12:01:53
·
11 answers
·
asked by
butter with a touch of scotch
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
I don't believe in the big bang theory, i just want to know the base of this theory.
2006-07-17
12:07:54 ·
update #1
the big bang is not real. GOD is real. ♥ ♥ ♥
2006-07-17 12:05:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by L 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The best existing evidence is that the entire universe is expanding with almost all galaxies traveling rapidly away from one another. There are certain galaxies within a family that are converging but the family is part of the expansion. If someone had been making a motion picture of the process for billions of years, it it fair to speculat that the projector could be run backwards to the beginning of time (at fast speed?). Although that is not possible, it is clear that the reverse of expansion is contraction. If the Universe contracted all the way back to the beginning of time it likely would form a "singularity" similar to the center of a black hole where gravitational attraction is so intense that light can not escape and all the laws of physics as we know them are likely violated or nonexistent. If all the Universe fit into a singularity it might be as large as the period ending this statement (.) Without laws of physics it is fair to speculate that perhaps the universe converges than expands then converges then expands, like a pendulum swinging back and forth. Perhaps the expansions and contractions alternate between matter and anti-matter. It is impossible to know and a great field for science fiction writers, right? It is good to maintain skepticism; while keeping an open mind on the Big Bang and studying the many interesting discussions available.
2006-07-17 19:56:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kes 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is something wrong with a theory which must be amended and twisted every time new data is discovered. The so-called Big Bang is one such theory. It's interesting to note that much of the data provided by the Hubble Space Telescope actively militates against the idea of a Big Bang. There are many better models in cosmogony than the ever-popular, but sadly flawed Big Bang model.
2006-07-18 07:59:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by theheretyk 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no explosion in the Big Bang theory.
In the theory the universy (and space) was created with infinit density of enegy, this mean there was infinit heat in the begining (with zero space and zero time), so this is similar to an explosion.
So the Big Bang did not create the universe, the universe creation itself created what is called the Big Bang.
2006-07-20 08:06:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by gelrad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are ideas as to what it might have come from... Search Stephen Hawking for some of the most advanced theories. However, the Big Bang wasn't simply an explosion... as it has been understood, it was just an infinitely dense point, and it began to expand. Again, why exactly, we don't know, because we can't quite 'see' that far back, though we are getting close.
2006-07-17 19:16:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by DakkonA 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
one theory is that the universe oscillates. the idea is that after the big bang, the universe expands until gravity finally overcomes the inertia of the mass, and the universe begins to contract again. it shrinks back to a very small point and then there is another big bang.
2006-07-17 19:07:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Critical Mass 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lol.
Vacuum isn't a vacuum either. ENERGY (it has been proven) pops into existance ALL THE TIME, then back out of existance in what is considered "empty space." So, its possible that our universe could have started that way. Black holes, ie miniature ones, and other items do this too.
This doesn't "contradict" physics as long as the energy equals out (that is dissapates or dissappears or pop out of existance) after a while.
2006-07-17 19:07:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pick-up a copy The National Autobahn of the Night Sky and form your own opinion. It's to complicated to explain. Sorry.
2006-07-17 21:12:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by boyrambo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the big bang consisted of matter.this matter was leftover from a collapsed universe.it wans't really a explosion.it was really more of a flash.
2006-07-17 19:22:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by That one guy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the astronomy world is still arguing that. maybe some time next week they agree on an answer but i doubt it.
2006-07-17 19:07:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by de bossy one 6
·
0⤊
0⤋