2006-07-17 11:59:56 · 11 answers · asked by 1st time Mommy!!! :) 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
i did a paper on this in highschool. well for one the community is safer knowing that a murderer will not be getting out of jail to kill someone else. the society in itself is safer because we are trying to minimize our crime activity.
2006-07-17 17:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by taceysay02@sbcglobal.net 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i do not think that capital punishment is the answer. For one component, I agree that folk committing homicide don't think they receives stuck. both that, or they don't care one way or the different. also, I surely have this truly extraordinary feeling in my gut about those who ask to be witnesses to an execution. That seems grisly to me. isn't an execution a approach of homicide? that is planned. that is without emotion. that is irreversible. it is going to under no circumstances deliver again the guy who changed into murdered. And, what in case you're surely executing an probability free man or woman - it does ensue. does no longer we truly shrink crime if we had stiffer consequences for drug suitable crimes? What about eliminating certain guns from society, along with AK - 47s? Is there truly any favor for a non-protection rigidity use of an attack rifle?
2016-10-14 21:54:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if it does ensure maximum safety. It is a good way to stop murderers and rapists from repeating there crimes and for some it is a deterrent. But criminals still exist in this world and we can't kill them all.
2006-07-17 12:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by Chef Froggy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Capital Punishement as a deterant does not work. If it did there would be no murders in places like Texas. It is for revenge. Which is a dangerous road to go down since God say's vengence is mine.
2006-07-17 12:06:32 · answer #4 · answered by americanbygodd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't. It does act as somewhat of a deterent to crime. Even moreso, I eliminates the need to feed and house a nasty criminal for their entire life. We should have more capital punishment and less life in prison. I have better things that my tax dollars could be spent on.
2006-07-17 12:04:01 · answer #5 · answered by therego2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't, but it satisfies the meeting of justice by those who were victims of a capital crime, and it saves the taxpayers thousands of dollars by not having to support the prisoner for years until he dies.
Chow!!
2006-07-17 13:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont agree with it AT ALL, what gives "them" the right to kill someone. Yeah i know that he/she may have killed someone, but that doesnt give "them" the right to do the same thing. Wouldnt "they" go to hell for killing someone? Just because "they" call it capital punishment doesnt make it ok.
2006-07-17 12:17:25 · answer #7 · answered by The one who knows 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The perpertrator won't have the opportunity to try the same thing again.
2006-07-17 12:03:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for one thing, it ensures that at least one murdering bastard won't be killing anyone else.
2006-07-17 12:03:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No repeat offenders
2006-07-17 12:03:55 · answer #10 · answered by Bill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋