Clinton getting impeached was stupid.
The talk about Bush Getting Impeached is Stupid.
Let run our country and move on.
2006-07-18 10:12:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by man_about_the_net 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Nice. Another "Bush can do no wrong" retard super Reich Wing. I'm sure the war for oil isn't enough, Osama on the loose isn't enough, ignoring North Korea isn't enough. My question is, what WILL be enough? The nuclear anhilation of New York, or the beginning of World War III? But God forbid Clinton lie about getting milked by an intern to a Grand Jury who, by the way, had no business questioning him about personal affairs in the first place? What he did is between him, Hillary, his little black book and the free clinic. What Bush has done/is doing, hehe, that can be forgiven though, right?
2006-07-17 11:54:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush and his team deliberately misled Congress and the American public about the rationale for invading Iraq. Bush convinced a majority of Americans that Iraq was involved with Al-Qaeda and responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Yet the evidence shows that Iraq was not involved. Bush said in his State of the Union Address that "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" to build nuclear weapons. But he had already been told by the CIA that the evidence was forged. Bush claimed to have hard evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. But the UN investigators could not verify any of these claims and searches of Iraq revealed no such weapons. The real reason we invaded Iraq may have more to do with the fact that Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in the world, and sits strategically in the center of the Middle East. George Bush authorized the NSA to conduct illegal wiretaps on American citizens. Bush claimed that these were justified on the basis of national security. But there is a legal mechanism for conducting emergency wiretaps followed by court approval within 72 hours. Bush ignored that mechanism and exceeded his executive authority. Bush claims he has authority to wiretap anyone he wishes but legal scholars, including some Republican lawmakers, disagree. Bush and his team have set us a system of prisons around the world where prisoners can be tortured. They have transported prisoners from the United States, Europe and elsewhere to other countries for the purpose of having them tortured. They have fought hard to build a legal case for torture but the fact remains that torture is highly illegal. It is also considered an ineffective means of getting reliable information from a prisoner. Bush is guilty of violating of the Federal Tortu re Act, the UN Torture Convention and the Geneva Convention. According to our Constitution, International Treaties are part of the "supreme Law of the Land". They are not something that can be ignored when they are inconvenient. Bush's violations of the UN Charter and the Nuremberg Charter are, therefore, impeachable offenses.
2006-07-17 11:51:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. in accordance to Don C, we could desire to constantly drag him out bare and lynch him instantaneous. To heck with an impeachment. IMHO, there isn't any longer plenty there to justify impeachment. he's made tricky calls, no longer all of that have been ultimate. that's SOP for management in spite of the indisputable fact that. no longer all and sundry will agree or perhaps understand purpose for his judgements. apart from, familiar human beings don't have sufficient info to make an recommended determination. e.g. Going into Iraq replaced into the final component to do strategically. that is not commonplace, besides the undeniable fact that it is the final determination from an prolonged-term attitude. we are at war now- no longer with a individual u . s .- yet with an ideology. it somewhat is a confusing time certainly. it may help if there have been much less partisan bitching and greater understanding of the placement.
2016-12-10 09:00:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A President can be removed from office for any misdemeaner offense ... Bush has broken International Law ... and is still in office ... so if he farts or eats his boogers ... I think it will be fine, that is conduct becoming of a monkey ... he has not been removed yet, so it's unlikely he will removed at all ... you dont get rid of a President, no matter how unfavorable he might be, during a war situation ...
2006-07-17 11:45:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by londonhawk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then, if that’s true, we should have impeached Bill Clinton for dancing in his swimming suit with his tubbo wife on a beach in front of the world press!
Oh, wait, Clinton was impeached, for doing something like that.
2006-07-17 11:44:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Day of Acerbity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question makes about as much sense as the Clinton impeachment.
2006-07-17 12:44:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brandon M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Would someone would pls give Bush a bj so we can impeach him.
2006-07-17 11:43:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately George will not let that happen as he will not let another election take place.He will simply invoke The War Measures act and dismiss congress and he will be the Next Hitler.Remember I told you this for it will happen,I promise.
2006-07-17 11:45:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by theforce51 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
whatchu ON, foo?! Damm, og! U need to chek yosef b4 u be wreckin yosef, dat's fo sho. U ain't be keepin it rill, sista! Wurd to ya stank mama! Pace out.....
ps--why u be hatin on evry1 so much? Hatin heffer.
2006-07-17 21:59:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bonethuggg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋