2006-07-17 11:14:55 · 10 answers · asked by ravenfan 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
it's easier to get a pint of gasoline into your gas tank then a whole tiger.
The tigers fur clogs the fuel injectors faster.
Have you ever tried keeping warm by lighting a tiger on fire? they really don't like that.
You can't really get high sniffing tiger fumes.
Runing an engine on tiger really makes it roar.
I have never seen an antalope get taken out by a pint of regular on the discovery channel.
2006-07-17 11:34:48 · answer #1 · answered by boter_99 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
One of the oil companies wants you to "put a tiger in your tank." But only one tiger. You can get lots of pints in there.
2006-07-17 19:31:09 · answer #2 · answered by bpiguy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One makes you go faster and the other is a pint of gasoline....
2006-07-17 18:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by razorross2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you don't know the difference, i'll never send you out to get a pint of gasoline
2006-07-17 19:20:38 · answer #4 · answered by john m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Esso. Despite what they say, you can't put a tiger in your tank. I tried it and I've got the scratches to prove it ain't possible.
2006-07-17 19:02:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A couple hundred years after the tiger's death.
2006-07-17 18:37:17 · answer #6 · answered by AC 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either this is a joke, and you're hoping someone will provide the punchline, or you're on drugs.
2006-07-17 18:52:41 · answer #7 · answered by James H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a tiger is cheaper
2006-07-17 18:24:48 · answer #8 · answered by creative_idea_thinker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing. They are exactly the same.
2006-07-17 18:18:51 · answer #9 · answered by Jim 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lots of things...
2006-07-17 18:18:23 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋