True or False: The Constitutional amendment to define marriage shamefully political and sinfully divisive.?

Question

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, the only practicing minister in Congress
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/15049058.htm

Answer 1

True. The amendment is shameful and is driven by political motivations, not for the good of the country.

Answer 2

False! We already have enough fake marriages in this country to add another vehicle for it. If this law passes every single guy who has good corporate health care will be marrying his room mate that doesn't. Not to mention the millions of people who will be brought into this country as "wives" just to beat immigration. If gays want to get married one should just get a sex change and be done with it already!

Answer 3

I love how Christians talk about how sacred the institution of marriage is.
Marriage started out as a property arrangement to replace former methods of genetic dispersal, namely pillaging and raping the neighboring tribe's women. We became more "civilized" when we sold our women rather than allow them to be stolen. This form of slavery evolved into marriage.

The amendment would be divisive, so "True" is my answer

Answer 4

We should just outlaw marriage altogether. Would save a lot of money on divorces and stuff people don't really need.
Nobody really likes being married anyway. Most men just tolerate for sex and that is pretty pitiful considering they become wimps and house husbands for their wives.

Answer 5

False, I attend church every Sunday and I have no problem with making a marriage amendment.

Answer 6

Sinfully divisive as you'll find by the responses you will receive.

Answer 7

FALSE!!!!