English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Democrat, unless we want to see the end of the world.

2006-07-17 10:31:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If I knew the accurate results of the subsequent presidential election, i'd borrow each and every cent i ought to and after amassing the bets, retire. On a severe be conscious, i believe it truly is a tossup. I for one am bored stiff with the way Bush has run the "warfare" and Cheney lower than the table dealings to improve his personal wealth. i believe the overall public of human beings want a change yet like different elections lower than 0.5 will vote so the subsequent president will be elected by technique of the minority of voters. If there became an adornment forcing eligible human beings to vote or receive a significant fantastic, than we may have a ninety 9.9 % tutor in spite of the indisputable fact that it is totally last ingredient both Demoncrats or Republicans pick because then they could ought to completely answer for his or her underhanded dealings. i believe contained in the secret vote yet I do experience that eligible voters ought to vote no matter if or not they're "compelled" to lower than penalty of an truly heavy fantastic.

2016-12-01 19:22:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

With all that has happened, you actually have to ask this question? Read a newspaper, pay attention to what's going on and then you will see that there is only one choice. Vote Dem in Nov.
Here's what QuitarGadfly had to see in another question:

For starters, invading another country on false pretenses is grounds for impeachment. Also, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution essentially says that the people have the right to be secure against unreasonable government searches and seizures and that no search warrants shall be issued without probable cause that a crime has been committed. And the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requires that warrants for national security wiretaps be authorized by the secret FISA court. The law says that it is a crime for government officials to conduct electronic surveillance outside the exclusive purviews of that law or the criminal wiretap statute. President Bush’s authorization of the monitoring of Americans’ e-mails and phone calls by the National Security Agency (NSA) without even the minimal protection of FISA court warrants is clearly unconstitutional and illegal. Executive searches without judicial review violate the unique checks and balances that the nation’s

2006-07-17 10:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0 0

Neither. The "republicrats" have destroyed our political process. Voting isn't even an option anymore because all you're doing is choosing between the lesser of two evils. Politicians don't want us to vote because that increases their chance of re-election.

Ben Franklin once said: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" We don't contest the vote - we don't even try to do away with the Republicrats.

And as long as they're re-elected, they can continue to do nothing but suck off the taxpayers' teat.

And as long as we pre-occupy ourselves with such trivial matters as maxxed-out credit cards; $3.00-a-gallon fuel for our $60,000.00 SUVs; Britney Spears' love life; professional landscaping for our $300,000.00 houses; Jacko's pedophilia; "low prices - everyday" at WalMart for junk we don't need; and the latest rankings of our favorite baseball teams, nothing will change.

The Constitution allows us to bear arms against a tyrannical and oppressive government. Even Thomas Jefferson once said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." That time is NOW.
__________________________________________________
Check out the new blog book: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
__________________________________________________

Until Americans get off the couch, put down the remote, and actually DEMAND our country back, politicians will continue to enrich themselves with the money from lobbyists, special interest groups, and big business.

Meanwhile, we're like lobsters languishing in a pot of lukewarm water. Until the water reaches a boiling point, we won't start screaming! -RKO-

2006-07-17 11:00:04 · answer #4 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

I think a Republican should, but I think Hillary Clinton will probably win and we will have 4 more years of the Clintons.

2006-07-17 10:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by ginaforu5448 5 · 0 0

The person most qualified should
Personally, I would probably vote republican... especially if it the democrat is Hilary Clinton!

2006-07-17 10:31:35 · answer #6 · answered by A* 4 · 0 0

It doesn't matter what party the candidate belongs to. As long as the person running this country isn't a complete idiot like our current president. Who goes to war, which causes the country billions, and then proposes tax cuts. We have taken on so much debt and the Chinese banks are keeping us afloat.

2006-07-17 10:37:41 · answer #7 · answered by a_rajalonghorn 3 · 0 0

I try very hard to look at where a canidate stands rather than just voting for my party (REP) however if it came down to it, Id vote for Mickey Mouse as a write in canidate if it meant not voting for Hillary Clinton, her husband did enough damage already, she doesn't need to screw things up even more!

2006-07-23 13:35:36 · answer #8 · answered by Mel 3 · 0 0

personally i think it should be whoever can do the job right, since we really are going downhill now, but lately i have been feeling democratic, so why not. democrat

2006-07-17 10:33:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I like Bill Richardson of NM. Good man!

2006-07-17 11:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers