I personally think infants have great wisdom compared to a lot of people I meet.
Maturity is another issue altogether. Men and women have different ideas of what it is to be mature, whether or not they succeed with their own goals. Often people will have higher expectations of their partner than they uphold for themselves.
I will parrot many a self-help author by saying that maturity is found when two people can cooperate as equals. Yet most of us are used to depending on relationships where one or the other is dominant. Is it mature for a man to be dominant? Most personalities have a downside, and sometimes you don't realize it until you've gone a thousand miles down the wrong path. Maybe women don't mind the wrong path, would gladly give in to it if their male would just provide a stronger face to the world. The truth is both males and females tend to have unrealistic expectations of their partners.
I personally am looking for someone who is careful and considerate, whether they are crazy or high maintenance is something I think I can handle if I feel a connection. Maybe you just don't feel a connection. Like some of these people are saying, you may need to grow and change yourself before that sort of connection is possible.
On the other hand, maybe you are totally in control, and need an excuse to feel superior. I feel that my mother is sometimes this way, and it is one reason I haven't matured any more than I have.
I hope this provides some context from a male's point of view. I've been hearing belittling and belittling and I don't know what good it serves. Are the immature men the same ones that would belittle you?
2006-07-17 09:43:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by NathanCoppedge 6
·
9⤊
1⤋
There are a few that have had good role models and grow into wonderful men, but I think the majority just like playing dumb!! And they have the nerve to make fun of blonde's!!
2006-07-17 10:25:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sweetcakes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Talking of 5 years olds try checking your spelling! Try "their" instead of "there".
Getting back to the question: how many men are you talking about - the whole world's population of males?
All human beings of whatever physical age or gender will tell you that their mental age and their real age are not correlated. I personally try where ever possible not to act my actual age but my shoe size. (I am talking British shoe size here, don't know how this phrase works in foreign parts)
2006-07-17 09:50:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Raymo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is some truth in this. All of us have an inner child and I think that for me, the inner child has a bigger voice than for women. I think it is really healthy for everyone to listen to their inner child. We don't really have enough fun. And, I think that in serious relationships, especially marriage, that we forget to play with each other.
I think when men to get to their late thirties or early forties, we're pretty balanced.
2006-07-17 09:45:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Otis F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only difference between men and boys is the price of the toys. We are all still boys at heart. That is what makes us what we are. Just live with it.
2006-07-17 09:43:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by the_saint1963 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some of us do, some men live with women who allow them to behave as if they were five.... sort it out!!
2006-07-17 10:59:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by whatnoname? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are emotionally, and inteleectually mature men in our society. It is up to you to find these rare gems beneath a pile of useless stones. You will have to be mature yourself to recognize them.
2006-07-17 09:44:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Doclester 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, his regime did not very last, and finally he grew to grow to be fed on by skill of his own paranoia. putting aside all moral motives for abhorring the guy, it isn't plausible to call him 'large' as his regime failed piteously on the outbreak of WWII. even as Germany struck Russia with Operation Barbarossa in 1942, Russia collapsed (possibly not right now, yet they were decisively defeated) in part using Stalin's purges of the military. you observe, Stalin replaced into passionate about having the loyalty of his politicians, his people and his military, and to verify this loyalty replaced into kept, he may 'purge' (execute) everyone he theory may deviate from his regime. All 11 warfare Commissars were bumped off, 3 of 5 Marshals of the Soviet Union were brushed aside, fourteen of the 16 military commanders were bumped off, the army replaced into left with just about no experienced admirals, and further the air rigidity replaced into left quite a lot completely with out proficient commanders. thousands were shot, and far more suitable were bumped off – and on the point of a warfare with Hitler's Nazi Germany, who were then increasing their military into the Rhineland (1936) and forming an Anschluss with Austria, exhibiting that they were a rigidity to be reckoned with. some purges of the military to verify loyalty may be understood, yet even as this style of large style of include removed from the military with little reason even as they were maximum needed, defies rational theory. So, it really is what i imagine. On yet another aspect, from listening to of the circumstances in his Gulags, his paranoia, his cruelty, the way he dealt with his daughter and his ruthless, callous ambition, that is difficult to call Stalin as large. Manipulative and crafty, convinced. large? No.
2016-12-10 10:59:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are seeking out the wrong kind of men. When you grow up... so will they.
2006-07-17 09:40:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brent 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude we men just wanna hav some fun!! u women can get to serious but i gotta admit i still think american girls rok
2006-07-17 09:45:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋