English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

A man with an ego as big as the London Eye, a waste of space. He's a "whats in it for me" person.
What has he done for London, the square root of F*** All.

2006-07-17 09:35:25 · answer #1 · answered by Fred Flintstone 3 · 4 1

i could say he replace into balanced and not a genuine hypocrite. He presented a international maximum advantageous congestion can charge - manhattan final week did no longer initiate their very own can charge! The London inhabitants is now decrease that it replace into interior the 1930's so his 5 infants will make little consequence on the international issues - it is going to take yet another one hundred years for London to prevail in it inhabitants ranges of the 1930's (on the present develop fee) Having many infants in India or China is the actual concern, yet whilst all of us behaved extra desirable the consequence on our environment does no longer be an argument. It takes 2 human beings to have a newborn so which you want a minimum of three infants to maintain the inhabitants going, an extra 2 for this reason is insignificant. the envisioned inhabitants of the united kingdom is to stay 60 million for the subsequent 40 years on the present immigration fee. If we ban immigration we are able to be no longer able to maintain our inhabitants. the US inhabitants will double in this era. Having infants interior the united kingdom is great now.

2016-11-02 05:48:52 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

Tell me about it.! All he says he's costing london for the olympics is the price of a walnut whip a week. If you believe that you believe anything. Give me the walnut whip please! oh by the way it appears to have gone up to the price of two walnut whips a week.... And how much is the congestion charge now? He spends our money like there's no tomorrow. But there's nowt to show for it.

2006-07-17 09:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by Am I bovered? 3 · 0 0

Horace Cutler was worse.

(By the way Livingstone, for all his faults, isn't responsible for the dome being built or wasted)

2006-07-17 13:00:32 · answer #4 · answered by mickyrisk 4 · 0 0

The man is a complete waste of space. He rigs the traffic lights to convince us that his De-congestion scheme is working. He is a first class Pr..k

2006-07-17 09:37:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no not at all hes screwing everyone for there right to drive into london so he can pay for the 2012 olympics
warra man !
i love you ken

2006-07-17 09:34:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is a throwback to the socialist labour party,but is that any worse than than the new tory labour party

2006-07-17 10:42:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

so far. The Olympics 2012 will be bigger than him though

a much bigger waste of LONDONERS money.

He is actually great great great grandson of Dick Turpin

2006-07-17 09:37:47 · answer #8 · answered by super_star 4 · 0 0

yes-just like the pigs bladder on a stick ---John Prescott

2006-07-17 10:14:18 · answer #9 · answered by Butt 6 · 0 0

Dome
DOME DOME DOME DOME DOME

One word for you: DOME

2006-07-17 09:33:28 · answer #10 · answered by wild_eep 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers