I've noticed guys go for the high maintenace girl over the tom boy most of the time. They don't regret it until all of their paycheck is on her ring finger, on her feet, or under her butt (a car) lol. Tom boys get the guys with the real heart. They can baby her if they'd like but they hardly ever regret it.
2006-07-17 09:28:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by MzzandtheChuchuBees 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom boy
2006-07-17 09:27:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christ, I've never dated a tom-boy, but I've been down the HM path a few times. I think I might just get a dog instead; better company.
2006-07-17 09:44:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Smoothie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Something in between. The less maintenance, the better. But if something in between wasn't a possible choice, I'd probably choose the tom boy. maybe I could train her.
2006-07-17 09:27:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom boy, definately. I was married to a "high mantenance girl" - it was just not worth the continued effort
2006-07-18 05:13:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheDoctor 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'll say a maintenace girl but i wouldn't mind a girl who like to play basketball.
2006-07-17 09:31:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by kingn2006 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
tom boy
2006-07-17 09:43:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by river_runs 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I WANT IT ALL, I want a gal that can look good in the Daisy Dukes and then change and be ready to hit the Martini Bar that nite.
2006-07-17 09:27:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by fl2stay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would want to be with a girl who looks really good, but doesn't look like she has to try to look good.
2006-07-17 09:26:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nonna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd rather go with the low maint. even if she's a tomboy.
2006-07-17 09:27:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Art The Wise 6
·
0⤊
0⤋