In the interests of not seeing us go into an economic depression and the humanitarian needs of the world:
Mr Bush: I challenge you to a debate. Via video conference. Subject matter: World Affairs, US Economy, Poverty, Medacine, insurance, disaster response, terrorism, humanities future.
I will show up anywhere you want, no preperation, no prompters, no speach writers. Just you and me. VIa tele conference.
I challenge you to a duel sir.
I choose the weapon. Wits. An open live debate.
I want to speak for those that I speak to. Let the average American have a voice for once. Give me the opportunity and I will explain to you some of the things we could do to make our country the best it could be.
Honestly, Mr. Bush, I commend, as will historians, the major incentives you have given America to produce new business. Now I have the next part of that plan. The implementation. Let's have a good old fashion sit down.
Additional Details
5 hours ago
Doing something is better th
2006-07-17
09:03:20
·
17 answers
·
asked by
abehagenston
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Doing something is better then sitting there complaining.
Read some of my other answers if your question my congnative thinking abilities.
2006-07-17
09:03:43 ·
update #1
as I said, no speach writers for me
2006-07-17
09:43:57 ·
update #2
Ok, Abe, ya asked and here I am. Took me a while to find ya, but I agree to a debate. Can't do it over the phone though. My phone's being used by uhhh uhhh Mr. uhhh Powell at the moment. So let's just step to it rot here and rot now. I'll smoke ya out like that Taliban guy uhhh Kernal Osama Laden.
Let me just warn ya first: I did went to an Ivy League school, so ya can bet yer buns I'll smoke ya out. Sure I got me a C average, but what the heck ... Dad always said: What went around goes around. So just toss me one of yer questions Abe. Talk about any subject ya already said above. What's good for the goose is just as fine for the gandered. Bring out yer big guns son and let's prove who the real enemy is here. Gob bliss 'Merica.
2006-07-17 09:06:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rewsna 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
who do you think you are?! why should the president waste his time talking to you? you don't speak for the average american, or at least not me. sorry, but W is busy running a country and trying to figure out how to keep us out of another war, since the last one went so well! id rather he spend his time doing that than "debating" you. the question is, are you so set in your ways that no matter what he says it isn't going to matter? will you ever concede to a valid point that he makes? or do you think he's wrong altogether and only your plan will work? if you are so ready for such a debate and have so many backers and speak for the average person, go do something about it rather than type on yahoo answers a challenge that you know the president will never see! its a base-less challenge cause it can never come to fruition. run for office or something, then you can make your points heard.
2006-07-17 09:37:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by aaronne07 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really understand your question. But good luck.
I'll tell you why you won't be able to. For one, President Bush is not going to be on "Yahoo answers" to even consider speaking with you via teleconference.
There are solid reasons behind this --many beginning with the fact-- where you come from. You could of course say the U.S.. But, are you?
Even if you were the most patriotic american in the land, that still doesn't put you at the top of the roster. There are many factors to point out such as to why you can't speak with him directly. For the most part, it'd be unfair to both you and he. Whereas he has access to classified material. You, may of course may have a clearance, but even if you did, you'd be shoving through the system and going beyond your oath to keep your knowledge within it's boundaries. National Security plays a role here. A negative one at that. Specifically because you believe something will work to make a change doesn't necessarily opt a possitive agreement.
For example, you could speak about all the things necessary to "make" your case strong. But there is always......always something you don't know. There is always something the general public is unaware of, and even the President for that matter. The government and the administration especially love the media. As they can shadow what needs to be censored from the American people and enemies around the globe.
To make matters worse for your sake, you wouldn't be able to chat directly with the President. And, you wouldn't be the only "person" in the room with him.. IF... and there is a big chance --of course you may say otherwise-- you were to threaten he or material that is sought out to be sensitive material, you would be traced. If not traced, and your strategy seemed to threaten the administration --it would no doubt-- be recorded and reviewed by the NSA and SS.. But, you might even put your life in danger by submitting yourself to the FBI "most wanted" list.
You maybe labeled a terrorist. Of course you know you aren't and just want to chit-chat with Mr. President Bush --I wouldn't put it past them.
The government works behind the administration to "hide" public documents and other value of equal importance to "cover" their ***. When someone is to ask me your question, I'll just offer them a cigar, pat them on the back, and wish them good luck.
If you are really that serious about doing this... Why not just run for President? If you can combat all the administrations routes to bring hope back to the people of this great American land.. Please, try to find your way on a ballot.
Whatever the excuse is --it will most likely work. The debate won't happen. Never would. Well, not in a personal teleconference.
I understand you may have beef with the administration. But I promise its not just you. It's me, and a good 200 million others that arn't satisfied.
But your reasons for not speaking with the man, almost for certainly has to do with "Terrorism Awareness" and "National Security" among other things...
2006-07-17 09:42:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by stealth_n700ms 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Average American talkin' here.
Hum, seems to me, like the time to debate was
~ before the election ~. Kinda closin' the barn door after the horse got out, don't you think.
And, well, you didn't give us a plan either, just made a challenge. Kinda sounds like you'd be 'bout like any other politician. Ho-Hum
Do something nice for a stranger today. And tell them to pass it forward.
Good life to you.
2006-07-17 15:55:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by donworybhapy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, you didn't ask a question on a "Question" community line. Hopefully, your vierbal skills are better than your written skills or you are a goner.
And Bush can't even say "debate" without thinking of the fishing trip whe went on while he was supposed to be serving his country.
2006-07-17 10:17:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lottie W 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Essentially electing a Representative to the Senate or Congress who disagrees with him is kind of like challenging him to a debate. I can't say how effective that is but I'm willing to bet that those people are the ones he will debate, not you or me. Good luck with that though, I don't mean to discourage you.
2006-07-17 09:10:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mykl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't waste your time. Rather than that spend it on something useful in comparison such as staring at a blank wall or asking 'how high is up?'
2006-07-17 09:22:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by wehwalt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Bushie will have to turn you down cuz
his back hump thingie is being repaired...
Heaven forbid he debates without his back bulge!!!
2006-07-17 09:07:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You win by default. But next time, use spell check.
2006-07-17 10:07:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by lcraesharbor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are not authorized to speak for me.
2006-07-17 09:08:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by groomingdiva_pgh 5
·
0⤊
0⤋