Row v. Wade legalized the slaughtered of 50 MILLION babies so far in this country. None of which volunteered for it. Yet you don’t see the liberals marching in the streets for these children. No you see them marching in the streets for a group of people who not only willingly dedicated their lives to keeping us safe but also don’t want the libs marching for them. Who exactly are the libs marching for? Themselves? Must be.
2006-07-17
08:16:39
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Conservatives don’t hate women, we are the ones trying to get them out of burkas remember? You libs are the ones who don’t care about them over seas. Conservatives don’t hate children we hate the teachers union who promote teachers for not doing anything. Vouchers are the way to go!
2006-07-17
08:29:15 ·
update #1
Also please remember that there is a SEVEN year waiting list to adopt in this country and the VAST amount of people waiting to do so are conservitive...
2006-07-17
08:30:40 ·
update #2
Those of you who think it is OK to abort abies with horrible genetic diseases should talk to Steven Hawkin's mom ...
2006-07-17
08:39:46 ·
update #3
My goodness the silly libs are out in force today. Please read the question silly libs. I didn't sya I didn't care about either group. I care about both. And for the moron who still thinks we didn't find WMDs in Iraq and we didn't find clear ties to Al queda all I can say is where have you been dude? As for the moron who said GWB created the patriot act that was Unanamously passed by both houses and upheld by the supreme court. Dude open a book!
2006-07-17
08:48:05 ·
update #4
We all should be concerned about both. In my opinion, the libs are like drug users who try to get others to use them to relieve their guilt. I think the libs want to get us to think like they do so they don't feel guilty about their casual lifestyles.
2006-07-17 08:26:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheHumbleOne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why do conservatives hate women so much? Why do you insist on cutting funding for head start programs and public education? Is it because you hate children that are actually alive? How many Iraqi babies were killed last year by american bombs?
OHHH but you do hate women. You want to take away their rights for the rights of a ball of cells thats hardly a human. But then once the babies are born you're not really interested in supporting them. Until they're old enough to be in the military that is. Live babies so they can grow up to be dead soilders.
Steven hawking...what a cute example. Do you have any idea about the way he feels about abortion? You may think that you know or know how you would feel....
If my mom had aborted me...I would not care...because I'd have absolutely know idea it had happened.
2006-07-17 15:24:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Franklin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a obvious difference between legal abortion and dead human beings. If your case held any water with a Republican House, Senate, White House, and Supreme Court abortion should have been taking care of in your favor. It hasn't because the majority of Americans don't believe the way you do. This is a majority rules country , you should know that by now. I do care more about the 2500 soldiers. I am a Marine and they are humane beings.
2006-07-17 15:34:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by DEEJay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You speak of Row v. Wade as if it is a person. At any rate, individual mothers are required to make the decision of life for their children. It is true that many abortions happen when the mothers are not responsible enough to care, and that is a tragedy, but many other mothers have had children with horrible lives ahead of them before the choice to abort is made. This isn't genocide, and "baby" is not a race.
Would you choose to give life to a fetus if you knew that it would have down syndrome and countless other genetic disorders? There are limits to kindness, when life becomes torture itself.
Now more on track with your question, liberals care more about those 2500 dead volunteer soldiers because we know intuitively that their deaths are more unnecessary. A few old men (as opposed to millions of individual mothers) in the government made a choice to send these men over and keep them there, time after time, and even managed to fool you into thinking that it was for YOUR safety, rather than for your outrage at the Middle East in general. It is true, there was suffering under Saddam, and it is good that he is gone, but that should have been it, and we should be more capable of dealing with other foreign threats than we are now.
Liberals aren't upset simply with the 2500 dead volunteers. They are upset with this whole mess, dead babies and all.
Edit: It is also easier to care about smaller numbers of people because of the psychological principle of publicity. When one person is murdered, a whole community mobilizes, unusually free of hatred. Thinking on a scale such as yours tends to promote the wanton hatred of a mother's choice in general, just like the American response to Muslim Americans after September 11th. Humans MUST deal with these issues on a case by case basis in order to be the most sympathetic, and kind.
2006-07-17 15:34:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pendergast 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Better yet, why do YOU care more about the UN-born than you do about the 2500 dead U.S. soldiers, and the 100's of thousands of dead Iraqi's that have died in an intentionally mis-labled war based on lies and deception, that used the American people's emotional state as leverage after 9-11 by equating terrorism with Iraq in an offhand way? Why do you defend the treasonous monster that raped our Constitution, the one he took an oath to protect and honor, by initiating the US Patriot Act, thereby threatening our First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights?
What we Liberals fight are those small-minded, control-freak, self-interested, so-called conservatives, who want to shove their morality of hate and intolerance, and worship of the dead and un-born, down all our throats.
The joke is on you, that you defend an administration that cares NOTHING at all about you...just plays word games and uses a false morality to win your vote...and pervert this country. The joke is on you, that you that you think this is even about liberals and conservatives at all. You're being bought-out with propaganda, arguing false 'issues' that do nothing but steer you away from what's REALLY going on.
You want to REALLY help? Then fight to rebuild our horrific adoption system, fight for better wages/taxes/benefits so young mothers can afford to raise their young or rely on a COMPETENT adoption system, and rebuild our economy so we don't have to work 3 jobs just to meet our own basic needs...and while you're at it, GET A CLUE.
2006-07-17 15:43:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by tat2me1960 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you want to cut down on the number of abortions support sex education and condoms. Support single mothers. Support programs that help kids after they're born. Why do conservative only care about "babies" that are still in the womb?
2006-07-17 15:29:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by HelloKitty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah , Why be concerned about a mere 2500 young, healthy strong, intellligent, fertile, parental, spousal dead heros.
2006-07-17 15:30:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rja 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because that's just the way it is.
Now go cry your river somewhere else.
2006-07-17 15:35:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Who cares 5
·
0⤊
0⤋