English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-17 08:01:36 · 86 answers · asked by Kraljica Katica 7 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

86 answers

they are!!!
"The guy is the head but then the woman is the neck"

2006-07-25 02:49:22 · answer #1 · answered by ioana i 2 · 4 2

That would never happen. I respect women, but the fact is men were the ones that created civilization, men were the ones who created most of those great inventions. To this day most scientists are men. As of now women do partly rule the world, because the do influence men's decisions with their advices.

2006-07-17 08:12:08 · answer #2 · answered by Nice man 5 · 0 0

Women do rule the world it's just that they use mens mouths to say what they want the world to hear

2006-07-17 08:04:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Although women like to think of themselves as being as strong as men,they are not nearly as emotionally strong.There are times when women will break under certain pressures that a man would not.Therefore,I think it would eventually be chaos if women ruled and men just stood to the side.Women have their place and men have theirs.I don`t understand why they are not each satisfied with the role that they were given.

2006-07-17 08:07:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm a woman and all, but I don't think that a good idea. Any woman that wants to be a leader, needs to have a dam good man to stop her when so goes too far.Men are more apt to look at the facts. Women, well, use their heart too much. They hold on to grudges longer too. They also stab people in the back more than men as well. The woman who wants to run would really need to be very convincing!!

2006-07-17 08:15:39 · answer #5 · answered by mdzevolveddammit 4 · 0 0

They would change in response to the demands of the role.

Women are already at least hightly influential as to the way the world is run.

By and large women manage things better than men so I cant see that it would be any worse than it is now.

They might have to modify their nurturing natures because quite often an non- nurturing strategy is required to deal effectively with issues that arise.

2006-07-17 08:09:28 · answer #6 · answered by Paul R 1 · 0 0

Women do rule the world what are you talking about.

2006-07-17 08:04:08 · answer #7 · answered by Lucid_dreams 4 · 0 1

What do you mean, what if? Women do rule the world but men are just too stupid to realise it. I mean, you don't think any male world leader has ever had to think for himself, do you? Well maybe they have. I think wars start when the leaders wives are unavailable.

2006-07-17 09:59:45 · answer #8 · answered by Evil J.Twin 6 · 0 0

so whats new , they can handle it better than the males if you consider a few that have been in power in the past, they always seem to be able to hold on to the points they want to get across and act on them, so yes why not, they have not got a lot to prove,. but whats more important who is going to rule this country and get it back on track, Blair has lost it big time.

2006-07-17 08:15:15 · answer #9 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

that would be great, but once every month, for an entire 5 to 7 days, the world would have to watch out because that would be the time the whole world would be vulnerable to atomic and nuclear attacks

2006-07-17 08:07:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

first we have to rule the men that rule the world, then the rest is a piece of cake.

2006-07-17 08:05:23 · answer #11 · answered by Angel 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers