http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50382
2006-07-17 07:57:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
because they are scared of their new nuclear weapons and don't want to endanger Japan or China. China wouldn't care anyway...
2006-07-17 08:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world powers have stood by while we have taken prisoners, shipped them off to undisclosed locations, refused red cross access to them, all this without any actual declaration of war. We would have tried them without telling them what the charges were or even have let them be present at their trial had it not been for our own supreme court and even now there are those trying to bypass a legitimate trial for these people. Why is it that when Saddam tried and convicted people without them having any say, it was a war crime but when we want to do the same its "more than those terrorists deserve". As why doesn't the world community do something about us?
2006-07-17 08:24:26 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the same reasons America allowed Japan to bomb Pearl Harbor: money. The same reason Prescott Bush, grandfather of the retard in office now, sold munitions to the Nazis: money. The same reason Coca-Cola sold Fanta Orange to the Nazis: money. Atrocities are allowed to flourish in this world because people [mostly Americans] believe the FIRST thing they hear and see and read. They don't question ANYTHING until it's too late and then they're standing around looking stupid and asking 'how could this have happened?'
2006-07-17 08:03:57 · answer #3 · answered by photojoe40 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For one, their army is very powerful so an invasion would be nothing in comparison to what is going on in Iraq. Most of the world doesnt care. What about our concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay?
2006-07-17 08:06:42 · answer #4 · answered by diaryofamadblackman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, China doesn't have much objection to prison camps, Russia is still recovering from the collapse of the Soviet Union, and we have gotten bogged down in a quagmire in the Middle East.
2006-07-17 08:01:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
David Hawk, a former United Nations official who was involved in monitoring Camp 22, said that while reports of baby-killing are often hard to prove, in the cases he has investigated the evidence is plausible.
is this quote it is stated that it is PLAUSIBLE so there is No evidence this is really happening
2006-07-17 08:03:19 · answer #6 · answered by Preykill 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One problem at a time, economic pressure is the best way to deal with N. Korea, they would fall without chinese support.
2006-07-17 08:01:27 · answer #7 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the US is tied up right now and it seems that the world waits for us to do something. Kind of like Darfur. Plus they are afraid of the Chinese.
2006-07-17 08:04:32 · answer #8 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as they're not hurting us why should we hurt them? US never shoots first- heck we waited for Saddam to with-hold oil and threaten our economy. We didnt go in even tho we KNEW that he was killing tons of people. We just used that as a scapegoat.
2006-07-17 08:17:56 · answer #9 · answered by michelle112785 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are not giant oil reserves under North Korea.
2006-07-17 08:00:29 · answer #10 · answered by HelloKitty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well we stopped Saddam and his camps and the Liberals started crying for the Jerk. Liberals love dictators.
2006-07-17 08:06:05 · answer #11 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋