That is one way to prove that GOD does exists. Proving religion with science is a good thing. People need to open their minds.
2006-07-17 06:56:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by dnrh1989 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
That's the most specious logic I've ever heard.
Possibility =/= existence...
You'd have to more specifically define infinite. Generally infinite simply means boundless, IE without end. It's a physical characteristic in spatial dimensions.
Trying to introduce some kind of social order or biologicalness is mixing apples and oranges.
You seem to be talking more of an infinite imagination. IE, if our imagination is infinite, could we state that because our imagination is infinite we must be able to imagine all things, such that we must therefore be able to imagine God (since God is a thing that can be imagined, thus subscribes to the characteristics of the set of "imagine-able" things). Sure, our imaginations may be boundless, in that case if God is imagine-able we would be able to imagine Him. But, just because we can imagine a thing doesn't mean it actually exists anywhere in REALITY (outside the theory in our head).
2006-07-17 13:54:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael Gmirkin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course the existence of a deity is possible. However, there is no scientific means of proving or disproving the existence of such a deity. Hence, the possibility of God's existence is not an appropriate matter for science to address. Remember, just because a thing is possible doesn't mean it must be true.
2006-07-17 13:54:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by nardhelain 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe is NOT infinite. Read up on Olbers' Paradox. I hate lazy people that keep using God to explain everything. Make the effort to understand science.
2006-07-17 13:52:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by galactic_man_of_leisure 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In response to the statement from one answerer
"People should open their minds", two comments.
These are both quoted from other people,
The trouble with having an open mind is that other
people come around and put things in it. Or
The object of opening the mind, as of opening
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid.
I think the second of these quotations is from
G.K.Chesterton.
As for your statement "Must be" there is no must
about it.The premise is faulty, and the conclusion
is a non sequitur.
2006-07-17 14:09:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't live in an infinite universe, we live in an expanding universe.
Besides, the term infinite (in this case) is in regards to size, not possibilities.
2006-07-17 13:55:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by l00kiehereu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are a million and 1 ways to prove God's existence... that isn't one of them.
2006-07-17 13:53:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by The anti-emo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then one of the possibilities is you're really a snail right? Sure sure, justify it however you want.
2006-07-17 13:50:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He saw your arguement and the creator commited suicide. No creator now
2006-07-17 13:54:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dr M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm glad you follow your logic
2006-07-17 13:54:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋