Who is more dangerous: **** Cheney, Condi Rice or Donald Rumsfeld?

Question

We all know the GWB is an idiot front man for this cabal and their oil company cronies, so I don't count him. As for these three, clearly they intend to enforce the corporate exploitation of all the world's resources at gunpoint. Which of them is the most likely to cause the global conflict they are toying with?

Answer 1

Donald Rumsfeld. **** Cheney's health is too bad, and Condi Rice isn't in the position of power or as well-established as Rumsfeld is. Besides, he's an old, rich white man and she's an African American female - the good old boys' network will never accept her.

Answer 2

OK... I'll take a stab at this, and accept the flames that I will most likely be on the receiving end of.

Apparently we DON'T all know that President Bush, jr. is an idiot front man. Many people attempted to make that same accusation about President Ford, President Carter, President Reagan, President Bush, sr, and President Clinton. NO ONE gets to that level without a decent amount of intelligence (and NONE of them to date has had even AVERAGE intelligence.. they have all been in the above average range at least. This President is absolutely no exception.

**** Cheney is NOT running for President after his term of office is over. Therefore, he is a non-power in Washington. THe weakest man in the Washington power circles is the VP. He has no decision making ability, and is required to follow the directions of the President and to attend national and international events that the President is either unable to, or unwilling to attend. The VP is only a PR figure most times. Therefore, he is no more dangerous than you are with your hateful, ignorant rhetoric.

Donald Rumsfeld DOES have the power to create Defense Department policy; however he is unable to do ANYTHING without Congressioal approval. He is in charge of the best equipped and best trained military force since the Roman Legions, and he cannot even tell them to fight the bad guys sitting on the White House lawn without the President telling him to, and the Congress approving it. No danger there, either, it seems.

Now, then... let's check out Mrs. Rice:
She meets with leaders of foreign governments BY HERSELF, and in private. Although she is mandated by law to do what the President tells her to do, and to spread the message HE wants passed along, there is nothing to keep her from insulting these foreign leaders and causing enough damage for them to break and dissolve all trade and alliance agreements before anyone can stop her. If she is having a bad day, and the Prime Minister of Britain tells her she he liked her hair in na different style, she can do enough damage to cause the British to leave us high and dry in Iraq. She can also do the same with the Spanish, the Polish, the Italians, and every other nation involved over there.THERE is your dangerous one. Just keep in mind... the female of the species is ALWAYS the more dangerous one. While the men stand around blustering and beating their chests, who do you think it is they are trying to impress?

Answer 3

Cheney. I think the most unethical of the bunch. Definitely the scariest. He may be old, but he has a lot of power.

As far as Condi being a threat to the Democratic party's black vote---doubtful. I'm black and female. Give people a little more credit. I wouldn't vote for someone just because we share a race/gender. So far, she's so identified with the Bush Administration, I think she would have to really convince people she is her own person. I don't trust her at this point. I think she's smart. I have no doubt about that. But some of her alliances may prove to be her downfall.

Answer 4

Condi is the most dangerous to the Democratic party. She is a black woman and may be president some day. What will the Dems do when the Republicans successfully siphon off the black voters that the Democrat elite has taken for granted for the past 30 years?

The other 2 men are retiring after this term and will be no threat to you.

Answer 5

Condi Rice is perhaps the smartest person in Washington, she is not part of your imaginary cabal.

Rumsfeld has rendered himself inneffective so even mentioning him renders your argument moot.

**** Cheney is one of the more politically astute players in Washington. He can get almost anything done by brokering votes. He has broken from past tradition of vice presidents who wanted the position to step into the Oval Office he has no such pretentions.

Answer 6

"These three, clearly intend to enforce the corporate exploitation of all the world's resources at gunpoint". Clearly you left out the compelling evidence that led you to this conclusion.
Follow the trail of bread crumbs back to your ability to reason and think outside the tunnel.

Answer 7

Oh, Don Rumsfeld, almost definitely! Now, on the different component of the ledger, we've: Nancy (Facelifted) Pelosi, Howlin' Howie Dean, and furry Harry Reid, none of whom are waiting to do plenty harm as they have just about no potential. If the Dems take the domicile or the Senate in November, in spite of the shown fact that, only wait and notice who will then be seen worse for u.s.!

Answer 8

I believe Cheney is the puppeteer, just one of the gang who are willing to sell their soul to the devil.

The worrying thing is, he will remain in the republican administration, along the Karl Rove (the so called brains behind the operation)

speaking of Karl Rove, he has taken Arnie under his wing, and is trying to change the constitution for him to be able to run for president.

Can you imagine it, Arnie sending the troops off to war, It maybe good in Hollywood, but in real life, and you know the people would support their hero(the terminator)

Answer 9

Hilary Clinton

Answer 10

Bill Clinton,Hillary Clinton, Al Gore

Answer 11

Cheney....because he often lies with a straight face and then finds a way out of the lie ....usually by someone else taking the fall. Rice and Rumsfeld...don't have good poker faces and usually umm and ahhh their way out of serious trouble.