He has said that feminists are all unattractive women and when Clinton was in office, he jokingly referred to Chelsea Clinton as the "White House dog". Come on! Look at him! Who's really the unattractive one?
2006-07-17 05:55:04 · 19 answers · asked by tangerine 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BTW, who looks better? Gloria Steinem or Rush Limbaugh?
2006-07-17 05:56:00 · update #1
I have nothing against freedom of speech. I'm just pointing out the fact that the pot is calling the kettle black.
2006-07-17 05:59:11 · update #2
To the omen is here: Try reading the book "Confessions of a Former Dittohead" by Jim Derych. It may open your eyes.
2006-07-17 06:01:34 · update #3
Anybody looks better than Rush, even Larry Flynt. Gloria looks great for her age, and back in her early career was a playboy bunny for an article. I doubt Rush ever looked that good. Can't really picture him in a little bunny suit - although he has the rack for it.
Howard Stern also made fun of Chelsea's looks - but he publicly apologized after his mother chastised him about it.
And picking on a little girl is just so "manly".
2006-07-17 06:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by slipstreamer 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Interesting, personally, I've never met a feminist who wasn't a double bagger. Second part, the Clintons touted Chelsea around much like previous presidents showed off their pooches. Remember Nixon? His Chelsean comment was to ridicule BJ and Thunder Thighs for trying to do the same thing with their own child!
2006-07-17 06:16:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not so sure that when he says unattractive, he neccesarily means in a physical sense. You have to kinda read between with the lines with some of these talk show hosts. And in this case, should you do that, you might just see that he is applying the word, "unattractive", to their political / societal mindset and beliefs. Just to reinforce that statement, consider the fact that he doesn't refer to Ann Coulter as being unattractive, and she's obviously no beauty queen. Also, you must remember that all this is coming from a man who has to take Viagra to "get it up"......LOL.
2006-07-17 06:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligent, thinking people don't listen to Rush. Only the people so ready to be led around by the nose could even think to take him at all seriously.
If the people in this country would think for themsevles and be objective about any issue, Rush would be out of a job.
2006-07-17 06:13:29 · answer #4 · answered by Imaginer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortuantely, Rush says he what he does because of free speech and it gets him attention...no different than Howard Stern in that respect. But at least we have the option of turning the dial or pushing a button and can find someone else worthy to listen to...
2006-07-17 06:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by WhyAskWhy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally do not care for attacks on people's looks. I do, however, agree with his assessment of the policies of the Clinton's. They are unabashed Socialists and that is completely cross grain to what this country was founded on.
2006-07-17 06:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some ugly people ridicule others to make themselves feel better about themselves. He has more nerve than get up and go if you know what I mean. Gloria Steinham any day.
2006-07-17 05:57:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ditto. And double ditto with Ginger1.
And not all of Clinton's posse was "socialist".The Welfare Reform Act,for example.
2006-07-17 06:10:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he's a twisted, evil, petty excuse for a man who lusts for publicity. Since he can't get it by telling the truth (which he never does) or doesn't want the kind he gets due to his drug addictions, he uses name-calling.
2006-07-17 05:58:44 · answer #9 · answered by Silent Kninja 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow .. you are obviously quite the Rush Limbaugh fan aren't you? I mean I don't like the guy at all .. it is why I never know what he says.
2006-07-17 05:58:50 · answer #10 · answered by sam21462 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋