2006-07-17 05:13:25 · 8 answers · asked by Patrick R 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
you still would need allot of energy to brake threw the gravitational field if you moved at the speed of light you would just move faster the question is in qunatium theory if you move at the speed of light at what angel of a 360 degree circle and what if you stop if you started from moving from the inside out or outside in could you go to the past and the future both ways or stop time in all dirrections or would there be a energy points to use as a hypersapce stqargate. to open a point of origin
2006-07-17 05:21:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋
Surprisingly the answer is yes. But its a little more complicated...we percieve what physics refers to as "events" (you drop a ball to the ground) someone who is observing this sees it at the moment that the light reflected from the event reaches the observer's eyes...at this point it is a past event. Now take this a little further. if you calculated a point in space and had a telescope precise enough to see the ball hit the ground. If you travelled away from the event fast enough...and then turned around. Depending on how far away you travelled...you could be viewing an event that happened years ago. A perfect example is that a couple of years ago scientists observed a star supernova. Scientists estimated that the event actually happened thousands...if not millions of years ago. The reason we only recently saw the event...is simply b/c it took the light THAT LONG to travel to our eyes. Don't be confused though...this isn't time travel.it's just physics' way of documenting history! You aren't seeing it as it happens. Just like the supernova...it has already happened...it has just taken this long for the light get that far!
2006-07-17 06:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by Dustin S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. IF you could move faster than light (and that's a big IF), you could theoretically get out into space ahead of any other light (or other electromagnetic emanations) from our plant. Then, IF you had a telescope powerful enough to see detail on earth, you would SEE back in time - the same way we do when we look at Mars from earth, for example, we SEE what was happening 4 minutes ago (+ or -, depending on where Mars is)
2006-07-17 05:25:24 · answer #3 · answered by Will 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. You dont need to travel faster. By focusing the telescope further in space we do see the past. 15 billion light years past
2006-07-17 06:26:42 · answer #4 · answered by Dr M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scientists have already surpassed the cost of sunshine on multiple events. what's presently no longer obtainable, in accordance to technological know-how, is the flow of strategies previous easy velocity. i think of the priority is that the strategies sure for emission is had to be warped. If one comtemplates the ramifications of this, it extremely is clever. The human ideas is relatively very like a hologram projector, and strategies is saved in neuron fibers and is hooked as much as a chemical soup. easily, strategies is warped interior the ideas, extremely whilst one compares left and best hemispheres. If warping strategies interior the ideas has some application, it may additionally be clever whilst utilized to tranmission proceedures... Your thought approximately an accelerator is exciting. the belief is sound, because of the very incontrovertible fact that no strategies is in fact being conveyed for a lone particle.
2016-12-14 09:08:00 · answer #5 · answered by kimbell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To travel faster than light means to travel backward in time.
2006-07-17 05:16:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the past has already happened and diappeared into time. Time is an illusion, it is man-made, so nothing in time can be viewed. We can only view past through our memories and history informations/written records given to us.
2006-07-17 05:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think so. if you could travel at ten times the speed of light, it is theoretically possible to occupy every place in the universe simultaneously.
2006-07-17 05:18:35 · answer #8 · answered by BIG DADDY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋