if so how will we prevent this in the future?
2006-07-17 05:04:35 · 15 answers · asked by REGGIE G 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes he cheated because that year, alot of states started that electronic voting machines, and alot of ballots were not counted, and all the absentee ballots were not counted neither. on top of that, the electorial college wasn't doing everything they could to make sure nothing like this could happen, but they did. and also, his father must have had something to do with it.
now, if Jeb Bush were to run for president, the same thing will happen. i hope i didn't give Jeb Bush any ideas because we do not need another failure running this country
2006-07-17 05:11:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush wasn't elected as far as I am concerned, the country was duped. Yes, I am a liberal, but that is not to say that every time a conservative is elected I believe it to be a fraud. After all, one of the most liberal presidents in my parents' lifetime (Kennedy) also found a way to buy his way into the White House. It's not right when either side does it, cheating is cheating.
2006-07-17 05:18:38 · answer #2 · answered by Lisa B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He Cheated Both Times. He Bought Everyone Of. That His Way Of Doing Things. And Haveing Everyone Do Some Thing For Him So He Doesnt Take The Blame. What A Idiot He Is.
2006-07-17 05:12:31 · answer #3 · answered by mks 7-15-02 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither Washington nor Jefferson were bible thumpers by using any skill. in truth, Jefferson may be the acceptable in good structure on the prompt because he understood and insisted on the separation of church and state and he leaned in the direction of being a Deist. i imagine maximum individuals may savour those stances on the prompt. He changed into for state's rights and that is a warm button situation on the prompt.
2016-10-14 21:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by moncrieffe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, he did not cheat. Both presidential candidates in 2000 claimed foul by the other party, none of which has been proven. The US Supreme Court, which was left leaning at the time, ruled that Bush was the winner.
2006-07-17 05:09:12 · answer #5 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, didn't you hear???
He brought in "butterfly ballots", that the uneducated negroes couldn't figure out.
He disenfranchised libturd voters.
The Supreme Court elected him.
Second time, it was DIEBOLD who stole the election for Bush.
Seems as though left-wing wackos, worldwide, when losing an election, their typical claim is "the election was stolen".
2006-07-17 05:10:29 · answer #6 · answered by george s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he did not. I don't know which one you're referring to, but he cheated in neither.
Aurael: Even recounts after the results were certified show that he still had more votes in Florida, so exactly how would Gore have won?
2006-07-17 05:07:42 · answer #7 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the first election Gore would have one, if the recount had not been stopped.
2006-07-17 05:07:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should not pay our attention to such presumptions. Aggrieved person has right to knock the door of law. His opponent has accepted the defeat. This is more than sufficient.
2006-07-17 05:14:48 · answer #9 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO!! He won the election fair and square- You'd think people would just get over it all ready... there is nothing you can do about it!!!
2006-07-17 05:57:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋