2006-07-17 04:24:16 · 4 answers · asked by Hai Ram 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
They are one in the same: they use fear, intimidation and violence to achieve their goals. One seems more interested in financial gain, the other in political gain. The line is becoming increasingly less visible...
Land [which it appears some terrorists are seeking] is as much a financial resources as it is a political one. Exertion of one's ideas, interests, and influence through power [money or weapon] is what a lot of GOVERNMENTS do on a daily basis.
Organized crime tries to influence government to avert the interference of law enforcement or garner more access to avenues for income. How is this any different from terrorist organizations that have 'legitmate' political connections?
2006-07-17 05:36:04 · answer #1 · answered by erni_evilsizer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any one can be corrupt: politicians, the police, narcs.
Underworld are organizations like the Mafia and the Yakuza, who live in their own "world", "under" society.
A terrorist can be right up front. Although the Mafia engage in acts of terror, they are not terrorists in the full sense of the word, like al-Quada or the IRA.
2006-07-17 04:28:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
One is a position and one is a way. Revolutionaries are those who seek for to regulate societies. Terrorism is a device utilized by skill of armies, governments, and aspiring political moves.
2016-12-10 10:50:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
under world loves $$, terrorist loves allah
2006-07-17 04:28:00 · answer #4 · answered by RJ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋