I've paid about $50 per hour. Your best bet is to call a few of them and get estimates. Also, ask for references. I've had both good and negative experiences with handyman work. But having a gutter fixed shouldn't be too complicated.
2006-07-17 07:55:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by busy_kona_b 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
franchised handyman services charge on a average 85 to90 bucks an hour,you may be better off trying to find a local handyman in your area he may only charge about 15 to 30 bucks an hr.
2006-07-20 23:40:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by donley z 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
any good handy man will provide a free estimate , as long as your eves are fine it should me nothing more than nailing it back up which should be a very Minor repair you might want to call a gutter service they were probably dirty and the weight made it fall.
2006-07-17 03:46:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by jim100beam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Handymen will charge according to the damage.for more information visit our website http://bit.ly/1tslS7C
2014-09-05 22:42:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on where you live and how much damage, but expect to pay at least 50-75 dollars minimum.
2006-07-17 03:43:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Artistic Prof. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Military spending is "constitutional" spending as the government is charged by the Constitution with the responsibility to defend the Republic and falls under the "general welfare" clause. The "general welfare" clause does not empower the government to tend to the "specific welfare" of any individual. State governments have the power to socially spend because it is not among the explicitly denied powers of states and as long as their state constitutions allow it James Madison: With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. -- James Madison : I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. -- James Madison "@crunch: Thanks. So I guess you support Universal health care; which benefits the "general Welfare", instead of Obamacare, which requires individuals to buy their own insurance" I believe you have a misunderstanding of the "general welfare" clause. Actually, I believe Universal Health Care is harmful to the "general welfare" of the Republic If Congress believes health care or insurance is a right, the only "power" it has is to propose an amendment to the Constitution because Congress has absolutely no power to name a right because that power is identical to the power to take them away. You want everyone to have access to insurance, then no insurance company could deny coverage based on "preexisting conditions" or "ability to pay" if insurance is actually is a "right" recognized in the Constitution.... and only the States can put it there. "Universal" health care i.e. "single payer" i.e. government responsibility would put me under control of the same entity that won't take care of the roads the Constitution requires it to take care of and has taken responsibility for public schools which it's not supposed to take care of. I'm not the least bit interested in Universal "bad" health care. I'd prefer health care to be like the right to practice religion of choice or no religion at all, a right to be protected by the Federal government but otherwise not to be interfered with in any way.
2016-03-26 21:32:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Janet 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
uhm, why don't you just call them, explain the situation and ask them to give an indication of the cost?
2006-07-17 03:39:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by HiddenBug 2
·
0⤊
0⤋