Well, I thought the movie was decent, but the book ( as usual) was like a zillion times better...but do you mean did I believe any of the story? Probably, I am a big conspiracy theorist anyway, this makes for great debate, and sheds a new light on the already failing hold that Christianity has on people....
2006-07-17 03:10:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by ndussere 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, at first I was pretty skeptic about it, heard millions of opinions and read millions of reviews saying the movie was terrible. In addition I didn't like the idea of watching a movie with Tom Hanks. But I wanted to see it the same, just out of loyalty to the book, which is definitely one of the best books ever written. When I left the cinema I was astonished. The movie wasn't that terrible as everyone had said, I mean I liked it very much. But maybe it's only matter of taste.
2006-07-17 10:22:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked the book better. The movie didn't have the suspense that the book did. That movie disappointed me. It was nothing but talking, there was no action, no mystery. I found myself getting confused during those 30 minute explanations. It was like a two and a half hour history class.
2006-07-17 10:11:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kahne Fan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the movie would be more enjoyable if you've read the book AND are interested in such matter. Otherwise, I find it difficult for the movie to stand on its own. I liked it, but only because of the above reasons.
2006-07-17 10:17:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sick Puppy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a movie, I never believed it was to be a factual representation. As a piece of fiction, I enjoyed it. I was grossed out by the part where the albino put that thing on his leg though. Otherwise, is was riveting and kept my attention throughout and time went by quick.
2006-07-17 10:11:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by J Somethingorother 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The movie was alright. They left out a lot of stuff in the movie. The book is WAY better you should read it,
2006-07-17 10:23:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Slim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The book was better, MUCH BETTER!! The movie confused you if you did not have a chance to read the book which was a bit stupid. I think they could have done a better job.
2006-07-17 10:35:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by nukmeister1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
most of the movies are total crap no point in them
2006-07-17 10:09:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by peter j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I'm the only person in the world who hasn't seen it, including the Pope. But I'll probably still check it out.
2006-07-17 10:11:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excellent entertainment. EXCELLENT. You don't like Tom hanks work?
However, don't take what you see in the movies as real. You would be in good company, but that would make you a fool.
2006-07-17 10:10:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by crazyotto65 5
·
0⤊
0⤋