English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i know im gonna hear condi rice from conservatives, but 1 person doesnt make your work setting diverse, that is called tokenism.

2006-07-17 02:55:36 · 17 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government Politics

i guess the neo-cons are against diversity.

2006-07-17 02:57:19 · update #1

17 answers

Hi, david c, my name is Hank. The Clinton bashers don't care about that part of Clinton. All they care about is bashing him for doing such a good job, and to take the heat off them when they get caught in one of their numerous transgressions.

Clinton-bashing is at its zenith every time a Republican makes a faux pas. It's also used as a fall back stance when the NeoCon "spinner" is losing an argument.

Clinton's high popularity ratings, his accomplishments of deficit reduction, putting more police on the street and other positive things absolutely infuriates them. It is, also, because good government management eludes them.

The sad thing is Clinton played right into their greasy, sweaty little hands by doing what he did. What the NeoCons are saying about Clinton is because of jealousy, and is fueled by corporate money to keep the corporation-friendly Republicans in office, among other Corporate and Republican rationale.

The hypocrisy of these people has no boundaries, except bottom line dollars. An example of this is fighting a war for freedom in Iraq, when women and children are being slaughtered in Darfur. Not all Republicans are this way, but, unfortunately, Clinton-bashing is big on the cable newsies' gossip farces disguised to look like news programs.

So we don't get to hear about the Republicans who are in Washington for the right reasons. They don't make money for the newsies.

I'm surprised you're not getting bashed for this question yourself. I commend you for being brave enough to pose your question on a public forum. Kudos to you, david c.

If our Democratic impersonating officeholders had as much bravery as you, we might not be entangled in this NeoCon web of deceit that's being "spun" for us, the American Public.

Have you ever noticed this Administration doesn't make mistakes. They stopped us from paying respects to our service people returning from Iraq by putting a ban on pictures being taken of the flag-draped coffins when they arrive home.

It will take us many years to straighten out all of the falsities related to this Administration. Oh, yeah, before I forget. If you believe any numbers being presented as fact by these political exploiters--I have a lot of real estate to sell you. (It is located on Pluto.)

The statistics I'm talking about are unemployment numbers, deficit numbers, p.t.s.d. numbers, numbers of deaths related to combat versus "accidental deaths," and just about any other numbers you can think of. They are doing a great job at fudging the numbers of government and war.

So, david c, it doesn't really matter how good Clinton was for our government, it is how the "spinners" can use his name to promote their own deceitful form of governance.

What Bush has done with "Condi" doesn't even amount to tokenism. Condi is a tried and true subscriber to Bush's Adminstration and policies.

When you have a person who rises to her position, loyalty over-rides everything else. It is for that reason, not her race, that got her where she is. Her intelligence and race are just assets to be exploited.

Do you know we are currently building the largest embassy structure ever built in Iraq?

Hank Feral

2006-07-17 04:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Diversity is not the only factor that makes a good cabinet. Clinton had some good people, but he also had some total morons (Janet Reno, for example) who couldn't find their own butts with a flashlight. Ken Lay spent 17 nights in the Lincoln bedroom, at the whitehouse during Clinton's reign. I guess having the world's greatest whitecollar criminal as your friend is all a part of the diversity plan too, eh?

2006-07-17 03:03:45 · answer #2 · answered by JeffyB 7 · 0 0

Diversity is the greatest part about this country besides the education!

Clinton was one of the best presidents. His personal life should have had nothing to do with his presidency. Jefferson had a mistress too, you know.. And so did many other presidents.

2006-07-17 02:59:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YOU are wrong. EVEN if you are counting ONLY interns.

“Have we made progress? We’ve made significant progress. This president has the most diverse Cabinet in the history of America and has relied on the competence of a talented group of African Americans in that Cabinet from [Secretary of State] Colin Powell to [HUD secretary] Alphonso Jackson to [National Security Adviser] Condoleezza Rice and others.”

Williams pointed to the increase in internships for black youths on Capitol Hill, the rise in the number of black delegates at the Republican National Convention, and efforts by House Speaker Dennis Hastert and other Republican leaders to gain funding from Congress to complete renovation of the Washington, D.C., home of Frederick Douglass, the abolitionist and orator.

2006-07-17 03:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You know what? I think we can try all we want but the neocons can't see past the S_X!! Funny, how they got hung up on that one thing and won't let go. Forget that their R Reagan cheated on his wife, then divorced and married his mistress. That doesn't count. It would have only counted if he was a Democrat. The man( Clinton) will in history be regarded as one of the best Presidents we've had. You need to feel sorry for them because they do know that GWB will go down as one of the worst. Let them think they are superior. We know the truth and so do alot of others. Ignore them! They are the tools of the religious right and they can't think for themselves.

2006-07-17 03:07:10 · answer #5 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

Hey david c,
did you know Clinton has been out of office for 6 years? Move on with your life. Very few people bash Clinton anymore, as he has reached that magical Ex-President status. Even Nixon was treated nice after enough time had passed. Bush will also be old news a few years after he is gone.

2006-07-17 03:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by Steve W 3 · 0 0

The cigar hider rode the DOT.COM bubble. It burst presently in the previous he left place of work. all people waiting to study a graph can seem on the inventory industry improve line and see the bubble. I did and have been given out in the previous it burst. certainly I have been given out approximately 3 months too early yet that beats being 3 months too late. in case you seem, Clinton's nationwide debt as a share of GDP became into on the decline additionally. This due partly to the bubble forming in the dot com community (you strengthen your self out of debt). some million/2 way by his final 365 days this u . s . became into headed right into a real solid recession. GWB inherited that recession and if it hadn't been for 9/11 and the linked spending I doubt we'd have recovered besides or as immediately as we did. remember, the monetary gadget has greater sides than the desire diamond. it relatively is why tax cuts have been this variety of fulfillment at elevating federal sales. Tax cuts could have a factor of diminishing returns yet we're not there yet. This u . s . has actually no sales concern, it has a spending concern. precise now we are only getting to a concern think approximately the housing concern. So save a watch on expenses of activity and foreclosure. There are a gaggle of folk who took the variable fee mortgages. A maximum of them will see their abode cost balloon to 3 and four circumstances it is cutting-edge quantity. lots of them will could provide up their properties. in case you have some money, it is going to likely be straightforward to get into between the foreclosure in the subsequent 365 days or so. And, it's going to be an incredible danger to bash GWB for permitting the charges of activity to get so low that they gave abode purchasers a faux experience of protection. If that doesn't artwork for you i'm beneficial some communicate teach host will furnish you yet yet another mantra to chant on the Democratic convention.

2016-10-08 00:33:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Another reason to hate the scum! Diversity is a major step in the destruction of America.

2006-07-17 03:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

don't care. The main reason I hate Clinton is that he allowed the UN to use U.S. troops and planes to bomb thousand of innocent people in Bosnia, and allowed the UN to control the situation in Mogadishu, and allowed the UN to allow thousands to be slaughtered in Rwanda. He also gave in to N. Korea on the nuke program, giving them the tech they needed as long as the PROMISED not to make long range weapons with them. I do admit he did some good while in office, but I think that those failures are unforgivable.

2006-07-17 03:54:22 · answer #9 · answered by celtfalcon 2 · 0 0

Other than Reno, what diversity?
Why, other than Clinton calling himself the first black president, was he so good for diversity?

2006-07-17 11:59:40 · answer #10 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers