maybe we could have used that money and focus to hunt bin laden. clinton was giving a speech to un on bin laden but the media showed monica gate instead. source: the hunting of the american president-book and documentary
2006-07-17 02:41:24 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No the Clinton haters wanted to do all in their power to rid Clinton from office with aid of religious right who set themselves as the moral leaders of the country.
To me rather have the blue stained dress then the blood that is being shed in Iraq on our flag.
2006-07-17 03:20:33 · answer #1 · answered by murraystate69 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hey Clinton Lovers, did you know David Barrett did an investigation in 1994? Did you know congressional Democrats have been surpressing it for a decade?
Bottom line from the report: "the Clintons were using the IRS to persecute their political enemies", "the Clinton White House had perpetrated one of the worst abuses of power in presidential history", "Hillary is said to be particularly vulnerable to the Barrett report's exposure, since her old college chum, Margaret Milner Richardson, ran the IRS at the time."
Sadly it was released in January this year, and the Democrats were successful in having aorund 120 pages removed from the report. Such criminals.
2006-07-17 03:08:09 · answer #2 · answered by Wig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you should have forgot why Clinton changed into investigated. You said it changed into over his sex existence. The Clinton's were investigated over some shady land dealings. for the time of that analyze it changed into got here across that President Clinton had a sexual courting with a White abode intern interior the Oval workplace, even as requested about it in a courtroom of regulation, President Clinton lied below oath,and a perjury analyze changed into then also lumped into the Whitewater invetigation. Clinton may have kept the authorities a tremendous kind of money by using only telling the reality even as below oath.
2016-10-14 21:28:35 · answer #3 · answered by cohan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey idiot, did you know Clinton lied to a grand jury? Perjury = illegal. Of course, judging by the source listed you're not real objective anyway. Get over it. I know that Kool Aid tastes good but it's really not very good for you.
2006-07-17 02:48:27 · answer #4 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whats really a shame is that the clintax's have cut a deal to keep the large part of what was found under closed documents so the public won't be able to see what was found on them.
2006-07-17 02:56:46 · answer #5 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most things in government cost way more than is reasonable. It's too bad.
PS - The Clinton era is over. I suggest you move on.
2006-07-17 02:45:02 · answer #6 · answered by Molly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps if Clinton hadn't been such a corrupt criminal, and if the people hadn't been so blindly foolish to elect that corrupt criminal, we could have been spared the whole sordid story of Clinton's DNA spewings.
2006-07-17 03:06:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you aware that your questions either criticize Bush or defend Clinton.
I'm sorry but last time I checked you're not Clinton's mother so it's not your job to stick up for him.
2006-07-17 02:55:11 · answer #8 · answered by sarahboberra91 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And, he is still a crook and you can't trust him as far as you can throw him.
Sorry I like my president to do things above the table instead of below...
2006-07-17 02:45:15 · answer #9 · answered by I love the flipflops 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
43 million.
And how much less would the OIC have spent if Billy Boy had had an honest bone in his body?
2006-07-17 02:45:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋