Of course you can. I concur that he panders to the religious right to much, and I also agree that not only him, but all of congress has been fiscally irresponsibly. I'm a conservative because I agree with their international politics and have hopes they might reform the welfare system in this country, while I think the Dems want to set up a socialist system. There's nothing wrong at all with supporting certain aspects of a party or a president. I question the intelligence of anyone who buys a party line, left or right, completely.
2006-07-17 02:31:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Oilfield 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, I don't support ANY war. I support the people that have been sent there to do Bush's bidding, they had no choice. If you support war in Iraq, then you are still in tune with the Bushite thinking. He's fiscally liberal only if it's to crush another country, not for the sake of his own country. step back and re-evaluate just exactly where it is that you stand. I think you're mentally confused.
2006-07-17 10:45:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, you can support whatever you believe in, and hate whatever or whomever you wish. It doesn't make you right, though. Hating never does.
Anthony Taurus, you can't be serious. How can there have been no weapons of mass destruction, when 1. we sold them to Saddam in the first place, 2. he used them on his own people, and 3. we saw them there. I understand if you don't believe that they've been found, as it's not popular to belive it, but I know for a fact that they have because I was in Iraq when it happened. I would suggest that you learn a little about the facts before you post. Hmmm?
2006-07-17 09:38:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Think First 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would of never thought of Bush as a liberal. I hate Bush but support the troops not the war. Yes, I am a tree hugging Liberal.
2006-07-17 09:15:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by aggie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how can you when the two are so related? we are in iraq because of bush. iraq wasn't some den of terrorist activity. saddam did a good job of keeping that crap out. he was never in league with al qaeda either. THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. it was a lie. yes.. A LIE.
so, the "terrorist" activity that exists there now is a direct result of US involvement. iraq is just a battlefield. bush sends in troops and osama sends in troops. the iraqi people are caught in the middle.
so what war in iraq are you supporting. if you think you're supporting the war on terrorism, you aren't. you're supporting terrorism, not the war on it, because for every day US troops are in iraq, iraqi people are harmed and they turn to al qaeda to get rid of the US insurgency. if the US leaves, the terrorists will leave also. they have no beef with iraqi people. but since saddam is not in power, get ready for iraq to turn into an islamic state just how the palestinian people voted for hamas.
so no you can't hate bush and support war in iraq.
bush = war in iraq.
you can hate bush and support the war on terrorism tho. bush is so far from fighting actual terrorism that the two issues aren't even slightly related.
2006-07-17 09:26:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anthony Taurus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think it the other way round.
It is possible to support Bush and still hate War in Iraq, because you elected Bush and can make him behave.
You do not need to hate him, just remove him.
2006-07-17 09:18:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Saadi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would be a little more content to have you say you support an end to all wars and bush is a terrible president .
2006-07-17 09:50:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by playtoofast 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think Bush is Jesus freak, from things he has said and done.
2006-07-17 09:17:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Vincent Valentine 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can support the idea of fighting terrorism and still hate Bush, it is totally fine
2006-07-17 09:14:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by jon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I secont that motion. They did not have a basic plan. It seems to me that they are just going by whatever comes their way then they deal with it. They did not expect someone else was going to take over once Hussein was captured.
2006-07-17 09:15:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋