Why should the world suffer because of George W Bush's "Crusade" and Osama Bin Laden's "Jihad"?

Question

Christian extremist terrorists under the leadership of George W Bush and Islamic extremists under the leadership of Osama Bin Laden are both involved in a dirty war of supremacy against each other and they are harming the innocents of the whole world, who are brain washed to support either gang.

Answer 1

Christian extremist terrorists, lololololol...

That's the funniest thing I ever heard. Where do you get your info, some left-wing nutcase website?

Answer 2

I disagree that the world suffers -- if you can completely and effortlessly ignore something, you aren't suffering from it.

Bin Laden's attacks and Bush's responses may compel concern from some people in the world -- which is sensible -- but neither action causes the world generally to suffer, as of this writing.

Bin Laden doesn't have the power to cause that much suffering, and President Bush does not have the will to do so.

There are billions of people who are ill-informed on this matter. To those who have neither the will nor the power, and who don't know what's happening, or care, it's hard to see how these operations which kill few compared to malaria or malnutrition are so controversial.

Instead of a random shooting, a plane crashes or a bomb explodes. People still die.

It's hard to see how the "innocents" are really so innocent. You're responsible for your world. Take a side before they take you.

Answer 3

How bizarre is it that the majority of the people involved in the destruction of the towers, the attack on the pentagon and the failed attempts on september 11th, were Saudi Arabian. The instigator is Saudi Arabian. The financiers were Saudi Arabian. George's father works for Saudi Arabians, and we're conquering Iraq. I'm thinking that if Chinese nationals ever blow anything up we'll invade North Korea, 'cause George don't like North Korea. The world always suffers when a "superpower" decides it's not as super as it would like to be.

Answer 4

Well look further than your nose and you will see that people have been killed all over the world at the hands of terrorist since the 70's. Nothing had been done about them, and George was the first one with backbone enough to take the bastard terrorist on. Do a search on terrorist attacks in the last 4 decades. You may see things a little differently.

Answer 5

you're basically getting your self right into a pissing contest. Time to enable circulate of the gangster mentality. the two events are working as a team to wreck the rustic. Whom ever comes after BHO, will proceed the ball rolling, basically like Bush persevered Clinton's stride. stop being a lemming, and examine out to have an unique theory. there is the place the priority is, no person thinks for themselves from now on.

Answer 6

Why should we suffer because Osama felt the need to fly airplanes into civilian buildings on September 11, 2001? What are we supposed to do, sit back and let the crazy people terrorize our nation? I don't think so. You may be able to sucker punch us, hell, you may be able to do it two or three times, but you better believe we aren't going down without a fight.

I look out my window here in southside Virginia, and I see beautiful blue sky, lush green grass, and I wake up every damned day to freedom that my ancestors fought for, that men and women still fight for today. You think I am going to let some camel jockey piss that away or steal it from me?

If the rest of the world doesn't care enough or is too chicken sh*t to fight for it, too bad. We aren't going to sit back and let this happen to us without killing a few terrorists.

FURTHERMORE, a$$hole, our military is made up of men and women of all walks of life, all religions, and even those who subscribe to no religion at all. So you can hardly call this a Christian Crusade.

Answer 7

This is an interesting question and argument.

Let's rephrase: Those who use terrorist attacks on sovereign nations should stop. Those who defend themselves or attack the terrorists should also stop.

Seems we tried that after the Cole attack, the previous attempt on the World Trade Center, and a dozen other attacks on U.S. property and soil. Each time, the terrorists came back with something bigger.

No, I think with plan B, the one we have now. Plan A has already cost us too much in lives in NYC.

Answer 8

How quickly do you forget the scene of the collapsing towers on September 11th.

It does not matter to you that Osama Bin Laden and his ruthless gang have attacked at locations around the globe, but not at his own doorstep. And now he works against India.

Answer 9

I hold George W Bush accountable for high gas prices, double didgit inflation , and a destablized world. I wish Lee Harvey Oswald would come back from the dead and do his thing.

Answer 10

'The world' isn't suffering, as you imply.

The Arab terrorists and the homelands that harbor them are the ones who are suffering.

Islamic extremists only understand one language - the language on the tip of a missile. That's the language we westerners are speaking to them (you) right now, as I type this!

I'm not suffering in the slightest!