English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

well, look at the manner in hich he was shot, not once in the head .... at close range. And the lies that were told about the circumstances leading up to it. he was wearing a heavy coat, and then it turned out he wasn't. he jumped a ticket barrier and then we're told he didn't.
I understand it was a very emotive time coming so cloe to July 7th, but what happened that day was sickening

2006-07-17 00:06:27 · answer #1 · answered by Eden* 7 · 4 0

Maybe.
Maybe they have a reason.
Perhaps De Menezes was responsible? Is it really in the public interest....... If you were in Russia for example, would you even get to have any knowledge of the affair, let alone offer up an opinion. Or ask publicly.
Too much publicity causes a great deal of unrest which cannot be rectified. Who will ever know the truth? What will it solve anyway?
Just an off the cuff response, could be debated for hours. Ain't no smoke without fire.....

2006-07-16 23:59:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely. You know you live in a facist police state when the pigs can run around shooting people without a care in the World and get away with it. Anybody that thinks we still live in a free democracy in which our government exists to protect us and ensure our wellbeing seriously needs to wake up and smell the sh/t hitting the fan!!

2006-07-16 23:56:41 · answer #3 · answered by Angel 3 · 0 0

No he RAN, The officers risked their lives getting so close to a suspected suicide bomber,
WHY! DID HE RUN
If he had done nothing wrong had nothing to fear,
WHY! DID HE RUN
I wish I had a FRACTION of the GUTS and NERVE of those Officers who risked their LIVES,
To stop any-one who they believe is A SUICIDE BOMBER.
If he had been A SUICIDE BOMBER KILLING numerous INNOCENTS,
They had stood by and did nothing you would have been condemning THEM NOW

A psychopath is released from hospital because of his HUMAN RIGHTS,
Then KILLS one person, There is outrage WHY WAS HE RELEASED
You are told because of his HUMAN RIGHTS,
You are still outraged, He should not have been released you say.
WHY WAS HE RELEASED
He should not have been.
NOW,
Suspected TERRORISTS PEOPLE who would gladly BLOW themselves up Killing you and HEAVEN KNOWS HOW MANY OTHERS
are held by the Authorities.
YOU SHOUT
Release them because of THERE HUMAN RIGHTS,
Then one of them murders your
# Mother,Son, Sister, Daughter, Father, Brother,
any one of these etc etc etc#

Or just a close friend,
Would you be happy
You had had that person released because of THERE HUMAN RIGHTS,

I THINK NOT
So what do you want
You can-not have it both ways.
When people are willing to murder or kill,
Willing to comit suicide to kill others for their own means,
Then they have in my oppinion
NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER

I want to be able to walk around freely,
Without worry
THAT IS MY RIGHT
AND YOURS

2006-07-17 00:21:42 · answer #4 · answered by itsa o 6 · 0 0

who was really responsible nobody will ever know.

2006-07-16 23:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

errr...yes?

2006-07-16 23:51:43 · answer #6 · answered by JayClutch 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers