English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They are "CLUELESS"...like the rest of the Democrats, clueless and rudderless.

What are thier solutions for Iran and Syria providing all the Hi-Tech missles for The Hasbalah to attack Isreal.

How would they handle China and Russia that favor Iran for oil discounts and weaponry.

What's the Democratic solution? Anybody out thier actually know?

I mean a concrete, pragmatic immediate applicable policy. . . what is it...besides "Cut and Run" ala Kerry ???

The UN is impotent, NATO can't be found so what
say the Dems???

2006-07-16 23:37:21 · 7 answers · asked by baltic072 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

1) Pass a resolution we will withdrawl is the first step.
Why first.....because it is not clear that there is a desire to ever leave. We closed the Bin Sultan Airbase.
We now are left with the need of a strategic foothold in the region....Might as well be Iraq....13 bases a super embassy bigger than the vatican and counting...

2) Determine what role the United states will have in the Iraqi civil war.

Very important question, why?
Becaue once we decide we are going to leave, we next have to decide what role to have in the war for power amongst the Iraqi themselves.
Remember the security issue with Al Queda is completely diffrent issue than the power grab between Iraqi factions.

If we decide that we should not interfere with thier civil war then we begin to pull out troop within a
either
a) a time frame based on Iraqi achievement meaning
having enough trained troops, police, infrastructure, shcools, government, elections

or
b) a strict time frame of our choosing, suggesting that they are on their own, and that whatever government WE establish will be replaced by the will of the people. We desinate a couple of years and pull out gradually. or whatever time line is most sensible.

If we decide to take a side in the Iraqi civil war we must then not only back and arm one side but offer intellgence and training.
We can pull out troops and fund monteralliy our choosen side and give them US weapons.....this has backfired inthe past.

3) To win correctly......


a) Pour more troops into the region, more troops to secure the borders,
create real securtiy

b) Elect a new congress to investigate

war profiteering....

and elect a new adminstration.

c) after a gradual withdrawl of troops Use the UN and nieghboring countries to form a coalition as in Kosevo

d) Create jobs in Iraq, giving
the people the opportunity to eat..

e) Create stability...

2006-07-17 00:04:06 · answer #1 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0 0

The "War on Terror" is a paranoid delusion used to frighten people, and steal Arab oil. 3000 people died on 9-11, but 4000 people die each month in the USA, because there is no universal health care. No one cares about them. Universal health care saves money and lives, which is why 20 civilized democracies have it. Bush's incompetence allowed 9-11 to happen. There were warnings from Israel, France and the FBI prior to 9-11. Bush has stirred up a hornet's nest in the Mid-East, and nuclear weapons will soon be used.

2006-07-16 23:54:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can not answer the question for them; however, I can answer that an intelligent surgeon does not use a sword on a patient to removea few cancer cells. See if you can understand the anology.

Why would the US need strategies for Iran or Syria? They are not our enemies. And who cares if they attack Israel? The US needs to quit supporting that roague nation.

You can not fight terrorism with a conventional army, invading countries under false pretenses to control their oil.

2006-07-16 23:48:52 · answer #3 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0 0

Babs Boxer has a tendency to be a foul, mudslinger whilst down interior the polls. She's your classic libby, mendacity approximately her opponent. Unfort, many Californians are too dumb to realize this. She is somewhat defeatable, enable's wish and artwork complicated for that end.

2016-11-02 05:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

by running away and calling for sanctions.
dean would shriek again thus scaring the muslims away.
boxer would nag them about guns.
teddy boy would give them a ride .

2006-07-16 23:42:39 · answer #5 · answered by glock509 6 · 0 0

The same way they do any problem , throw money at it .
Pay them to go away and then raise taxes .

2006-07-17 02:05:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

by continuing to make propaganda statements for them till they take over the US

2006-07-16 23:44:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers