Should the U.S. and Israel attack Syria and Iran?

Answer 1

At the moment, I would say no. First of all, the U.S. would have to install the draft again. We are to spread out to fight on that many fronts. As for Isreal, they dont have the manpower without ours or another allies help. If those countries cross the line though, we will have no choice.

Answer 2

No they shouldn't. I don't see why Israel should attack more civilians. I'm sure the U.S. would love to attack Iran right now, but if you talking about should they, of course they shouldn't. There is no reason, no Casus belli for Israel to attack Syria or Iran, and as for the United States, they have no right to attack foreign countries who have not in any way threatened them.
Israel should leave it to the U.N. to decide matter of world security, but until the United States stops using its veto power on any resolution to try and bring peace into the middle east, i think the region is in for more trouble.
The United States veto's more UN resolutions than any other country, and the reason they do this is to negate any UN resolutions that would upset the United States control over certain regions in the world. They vetoed a resolution to demand the halting of hostilities by Israel and other countries in the middle east, and the US said this would inflame the situation.....................
And as for Israel, their reasons for attacking Lebanon was ridiculous, they should have exhausted other means before attacking another nation.

Israel and the United States should not take matters into their own hands when doing so violates international law.
At present, there is no reason for attacking innocent countries, this would be an act of war.

Answer 3

No.. I think Israel is managing pretty good at attacking countries who are weaker militarily it's about time they picked on someone their own size. I've never seen an Israeli response that didn't cause more death and destruction than was inflicted on them. If(When) Israel attacks Syria and Iran gets involved we will see the first full scale nuclear war. Most people don't realize Israel has WMDs and has already used them in previous attacks. Those wild and crazy jews.... there going to kill us all.

Answer 4

If you think is it right from neutral point of view, probably in some world with morality I would say NO.
But this world with its politics and economy, gives enough reasons for exactly this action.
USA has for some time pointed in Iran , Syria, North Korea as axis of " evil", and also has pointed that there should be more "democratic" changes in middle east. So this gives them good opportunity, good enough to use it if they words about axis of "evil" were true in its meaning.
USA would like to see less religious and secular middle east, it did not go well with Iraq, but mostly for religious influences from Iran, and some help from Syria. You could easily think that you can try to resolve whole situation with Iraq by engaging Syria and Iran so you will now have all eggs in one basket .On the other side Israel would not let Iran have a military nuclear technology , yes again I think that they should engage and brief and swift bombardment of all military targets, and perhaps try to destroy leadership of both countries, and then try to think positively and wait for A. more war B.stable middle east totally controlled by USA.
But problem no.1 does USA have enough forces for this task, Israel will probably mobilize entire country for the military destruction of their problems but will USA conscript more citizens in to active duty?
Who knows , perhaps they can easily manipulate their media and pull the rabbit from the hat so that they could convince majority of USA population in reasons for this new military adventure.

There I said it.

Answer 5

No. They have done nothing to us and if Israel would back off, they would leave them alone too. This business of name calling and itching for a war will lead to a horrible end. Historically, countries that delibaretely stir up trouble and start wars never win them. If you want the truth, Bush no longer speaks for most Americans and most of us are horrified at what he is doing. Look for a big change in the Novemeber elections. If he gets a good war started before that ... well all bets are off. That is probably why our proxy Israel is doing this now. Think about it. Conservatives are very out of favor and are desperate to hold on to power. Yes they would stoop to that level. Bush and Condi are born again and truly believe their way is the only way (like all zealots). They would do anything.

Answer 6

No. They should be isolated.

It would be relatively easy to impose sanctions against Syria but very hard against Iran.

Isolating Iran would drive oil prices through the roof but it would be worth it if it did stop them funding terrorism.

Having said that if intelligence suggests that Iran possessed a nuclear weapon then the site where it is should be struck hard to destroy it as they are so unstable they would not think twice about using it.

Answer 7

Why the heck not! Let's all attack each other and get it over with! Peace? Not in this world and the way Homo Sapiens is acting!

Answer 8

SURE! The U.S. anyways should get a few good licks in before we get our clocked cleaned as this 3rd World War begins.

WWIII ! ! ! It's here, NOW!

Answer 9

Are you looking for the end of the World?

Answer 10

u want to see a united nation army Vs USA coalitions?