Do you think that he really was guilty of the child sexual accusations or is he just a misunderstood loving person?
2006-07-16 22:56:12 · 28 answers · asked by orion 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Officially he's innocent. The jury decided that.
I think the jury was wrong.
If his lawyers could establish a reasonable doubt they can't find him guilty.
The lawyers did their job well.
I'm sure he molested some children.
I don't think it was as traumatic for the children as the jailhouse rape that someone wanted for him. He was never accused of raping any one. It was just stroking kissing and sucking.
When I was a boy some of my friends would visit a pervert in the neighborhood and earn a fast $50. I'm not surprised that Micheal found willing boys. The parents and the kids benefited financially from Micheal's perversion. They were using him and he was using them.
I'm sure in his mind Michael thought he was a gentle loving person.
I hope he learned his lesson and finds a legal sex partner so he won't indulge in his perversion any more.
Where he lives now he could be executed for molesting children. But Gary Glitter got away with it and he's not as rich and famous as Michael.
You do know who Gary Glitter is don't you. His biggest hit was that one word song "Hey" that they play at sporting events.
2006-07-16 23:44:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Thats a really hard question to answer. I can't say for sure as their is evidence pointing both ways. But if I had to lean one way I would say guilty. I hear all the time that his mind is like a child. Well do children get married and have children. And don't children at a certain age get separated from the same bed. So even if he was not molesting them sexually he had no business with those kids in his bed. And if he is guilty I blame the parents just as much. Give me a break, I would not let my kids go to a sleep over at a grown mans house.
2006-07-17 06:23:05 · answer #2 · answered by Umm Ali 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really do think he was innocent. Maybe I'm nuts, but I really do. I think he's trying relive a childhood that he never got to live. A pyschologist once said that his mind was stuck at like 14 years old. I truly think that he doesn't see anything wrong with a sleepover. But, the only people that know for sure are Michael, the accusers and God.
2006-07-17 06:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, legally he's been declared innocent. So we cannot comment on that. On a personal level also, I do think he was innocent. He should however have been careful & discreete in the ways he expressed his love for kids.
2006-07-17 06:06:39 · answer #4 · answered by Supreme_Guru 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't. He's a weird freakin guy. Also, it's those dirtbag parents making accu$ation$. The only thing he's guilty of is not making anymore sweet albums. Quincy Jones...please write Michael a new one. thank you.
2006-07-17 06:03:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really care but if I had to make a decision I would say guilty! Even if he was trying to be loving its wrong!
2006-07-17 06:00:06 · answer #6 · answered by ~Bethany~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! There was never any proof just some gold digging moms and the kids who kept changing their stories!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2006-07-17 10:42:41 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
Innocent till proven Guilty !
Was proven Not Guilty.
He is a sweet person - These kind of people are assets to this world - they keep you entertained.
2006-07-17 06:00:14 · answer #8 · answered by R G 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-07-17 05:59:13 · answer #9 · answered by Miss LaStrange 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. I agree with the Jury in most cases, this one is no different.
2006-07-17 05:59:39 · answer #10 · answered by Help pls 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋