What are the non-religious arguments against cloning humans?
2006-07-16 22:32:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
My personal argument against human cloning is because with anything we do in biological science we will most likely screw up quite a bit before we get it right. And I personally can't justify the creation of people with serious developmental/health issues just to satisfy our own curiosity.
2006-07-17 10:00:24 · answer #1 · answered by tsubame_z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reasons to clone are mostly medical. As soon as you clone somebody they are a person only to be murdered to be used as medical parts. We are also overpopulating the world already what is the purpose of creating more life when we are already irresponsible enough with the life we have now.
2006-07-17 05:38:59 · answer #2 · answered by the_fun_lovin_criminal_187 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mainly availability issues.
Presumably the rich get to benefit first. The poor much later or never depending on price. Something tells me it won't be covered under basic medicare/medicaide/HMO.
That is bound to create real tensions (conflict and violence) both within our society and with those people on the outside looking in.
Otherwise, let's go! I hope my kids clone themselves for my grandchildren.
2006-07-17 05:40:31 · answer #3 · answered by aka DarthDad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NON-RELIGIOUS PERSONS DO NOT CARE FOR ETHICS .
AND RELIGIOUS PERSONS DO NOT BELIEVE IN CLONING .
BUT ... WE MUST KNOW THAT THERE ARE DISADVANTAGES IN CLONING ... SHEEP DOLLY FOR EXAMPLE .. HAD COMPLICATIONS IN BREATHING SYSTEM ..
AND WE MUST ASK OURSELVES . WHY THERE IS A MALE AND FEMALE .AND OFF COURSE HUMANS ARE NOT LIKE ANIMALS .. THEY HAVE BRAINS .. I MEAN .. CLONING OR NOT . IS NOT AN ETHICAL PROBLEM . IT IS A SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM ...
2006-07-17 05:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by u&me 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The world already can barely handle the population... enough people are being created the natural way.
2006-07-17 05:38:00 · answer #5 · answered by smokingun 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they always have defects.
2006-07-17 05:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by double v 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋