Love comes first. A man only have lust for a woman because of his love to her.
But lust will never make a love last! Just like having sex with a person does not mean u love her! It may be pure sexual satisfaction.. But love without lust will also not work also, as the passion will be gone. So love & lust should co-exist, with a balanced portion.
This is tough, that's why many couple unbalanced it and in the end did not make it through
2006-07-16 22:21:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by a V a 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lust appear when there's an interesting between 2 person who fell in love, but lust may appear without love. So, I think love for lust is more better than lust for love.
2006-07-17 05:38:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by white jade 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lust leads to love.
love is natures way of making babies
unless you are talking about mental connection and perseverance(platonic) which religious people confuse for love
2006-07-17 05:18:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are entirely seperate but they can coexist.
2006-07-17 05:17:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by vampire_kitti 6
·
0⤊
0⤋