To all you liberals who said celebrate I say you are nothing but hyprocrates. So much for the party of Peace. Freedom of speach so long as you agree, right? It also scares me that life to democrates is cheap. Why don't you guys grow up.
I AM WRITING THIS IN ALL CAPS SO SOME OF YOU BRAIN DEAD IDIOTS CAN GET IT THROUGH YOU THICK HEADS THAT I AM IN NO WAY CALLING FOR THE DEATH OF THE PRESIDENT. I HAPPEN TO LIKE THE MAN. I ASKED THIS QUESTION TO PROVE A POINT. THE LIBERALS ARE CALLING HIM A WAR MONGER BUT THEY WOULD TAKE JOY IN HIS DEATH.
I AM WRITING THIS IN ALL CAPS SO SOME OF YOU BRAIN DEAD IDIOTS CAN GET IT THROUGH YOU THICK HEADS THAT I AM IN NO WAY CALLING FOR THE DEATH OF THE PRESIDENT. I HAPPEN TO LIKE THE MAN. I ASKED THIS QUESTION TO PROVE A POINT. THE LIBERALS ARE CALLING HIM A WAR MONGER BUT THEY WOULD TAKE JOY IN HIS DE
2006-07-16 21:02:49 · 18 answers · asked by Arthur 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
.
Morn.
People who say they would celebrate are no better than what their idea of Pres. Bush is. They see him as someone who cares nothing about human life, but in celebrating his death they are no different.
Alia, stop spreading lies by saying the troops in Iraq think the job is done. Maybe a couple do, but you imply they all do.
DId you know Al Gore is a Christian too? So based on your logic, the Christian vote must have been split between the two and Gore must not have been presidential material either.
.
2006-07-16 21:23:33 · answer #1 · answered by Wig 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
even as I, as a Canadian, do no longer approve of many stuff that George Bush has lengthy gone ahead and finished in the united statesA, i'd nevertheless be a touch saddened that a existence became extinguished from our international. i recognize there are all too many social courses that ought to like to ascertain the end of the reign of the Republican party, yet I also recognize that maximum the different president ought to have cracked lower than the stress that got here about after 9/11. inspite of a few of the undesirable selections he's made, George Bush became no longer, and is no longer, THAT undesirable a president. i'm certain there have been a lot worse. If he became shot and killed, the guy entering into his position should be a ways worse... Cheney (spelling?).
2016-10-14 21:20:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely mourn for him. As already been said, he made a lot of mistakes and doesn't want to take responsibility for it but he was voted thus needed the support and help from the people. At the same time, if he's assassinated, it will be a shame for the country because it will show a big deficit in the system. If they cannot protect the President, how will they protect the people? And anyway, he's trying to do everything so just let him finish what he's started.
2006-07-16 21:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by rikku 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush invaded Iraq because he wouldn't tollerate a dictator. But the president has caused far more deaths, and sent more troops overseas. And one war isn't enough... Iraq was bad, there's also Afghanistan, Bush is calling for troops in the Israel conflict, is pressure for action in N. Korea, and is taxing our troops... and our soldiers...to the max. For someone who needs so little cause to invade a country and cause war, I personally think it would be a PEACEABLE move to oust Bush. The world would be better off for it. Bush has nothing but his own vendetta in these wars. He obviously doesn't care about the nation--just look how many don't agree with what he's doing. Even the soldiers in Iraq think our "job" there is done, and are plain outright upset at spending 2nd and 3rd and 4th deployments in a row in useless wars that our president forces on us.
If anyone is a hypocrite, sadly, its a president who claims to be a christian, but leads the bloodiest campaign ever. Not to mention the thousands of stupid christians who voted for the president "because he was a christian" and not because he was president material.
No, what we have on our hands is a mess, created by the war-supporting so called conservatives. So yes, I'd cheer for Bush to be put down.
2006-07-16 21:13:19 · answer #4 · answered by Alia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would mourn him. Being President of a free world is no easy thing. I am sure he is doing his best.
And to all you anti Bush people, give this some thought: Where else in the world could you be safe AND disrespectful to your President at the same time??? You're lucky to be voicing that disrespect here, in America, because anywhere else in the world, you'd be thrown in jail as an agitator at the very least. Or you could be tortured and/or killed, at the very worst. So, count your Blessings.
GOD BLESS AMERICA, HOME OF THE FREE AND THE BRAVE!
2006-07-16 21:32:10 · answer #5 · answered by bellefiore2000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At the present time given the conflicts around the world it would leave the US in a very vulnerable position,and then Cheney would be the pres and lord knows what could happen then
2006-07-16 21:11:10 · answer #6 · answered by Jo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is amazing to think that simply because a person is liberal that they would celebrate death. You are definitely wrong.
Bush is a war monger.
2006-07-22 09:25:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mourn, of course. He's a great president. I'm not an American too, and I know that well that he's well-rounded, I guess. He's a very good president. Even if I see him as a normal guy, not a president, I'll mourn too.
2006-07-16 21:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by Cherant 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah, I would celebrate too. He's effed up too many times, and keeps trying to avoid taking responsibility for his mistakes. I'm not even political, and I would gladly celebrate his death LOL but since he can't run for reelection, I'm content LOL
2006-07-16 21:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by High On Life 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had a chance he was here around the corner in memphis! But I would have gotten life.
2006-07-16 21:07:29 · answer #10 · answered by ♥Lonelygirl4u♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋