there are quite a number of erroneous articles floating about in the Net regarding this issue.
thanks to the innumerable gay/bisexual sites or forums saying that the visual effects crew of the movie Superman Returns had to minimize the "bulk" in Mr. Routh's crotch because it was just too big.
i don't like to believe any of the hoaxes, though.
Apparently, if y'all dint know, Brandon Routh was asked about this on an official interview with Ricky Lo on the E! News set of Superman Returns. You know what Routh answered? The rumors are just plain bluffs... they ain't true!
In this interview, Brandon said he actually wore two regular-size briefs just to make his crotch look decent in the blue tights costume. His wearing of double briefs was not in any way to conceal his supermega-huge penis. It's not really true that his "package" was so big that the people in charge of the visual effects of this particular movie had to tweak how that area bulges onscreen. There were no digital effects done to hide a non-existent supermega-huge dick.
No, Brandon just has a regular-size penis. It's just proportional to his muscular built.
Thanks to the perverts who suffused the Net with this perverted issue. Now, people talk about Brandon =D
2006-07-18 22:22:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Meh. This just baffles me. Really. I read the article. On the one hand...DC Comics is playing it really light-touch, saying it's just "a retelling of the origin". But. Geoff Johns already did this recently--about a year ago--with the mainstream character, complete with Gary Frank's artwork (and he draws Supes like he is Christopher Reeve). That was a much better and more respectful take on it than this new stuff. And the first name of the new book is now Earth One. That bugs me. The mainstream DC earth _started out_ being Earth One back in the day, before and during _Crisis on Infinite Earths_. The _Original_ event comic. The original reboot. So yeah, if they're name-checking _That_ it has me worried that they really are taking this _very_ seriously. And that's a problem. You see... I get it that there's room for a country boy from Kansas to be emo--hell, if you're raised out in the cornfields and have nothing to do, and have a frustrating life to deal with, it can (and does) happen. The problem is....DC already did an emotionally unstable take on a young Clark Kent (Superboy-Prime....don't ask, he's really messed up). And the thing with that is, you can't do it and keep the guy a "hero" that people trust. That's the thing. Original, Golden Age (late 1930s to 1940s) Superman was a darker, grittier, more street-level take on the character, but you can't really take someone like that to a place like that anymore in this modern day. People really do expect Superman of all people to be a fundamentally cheerful, optimistic character. Anything too different from being That Guy Who Flies and Smiles is going to flat-out terrify people. Take the human being out of Superman and you get the Eradicator. Keep the human being there, but take away the smile and you get Golden Age Supes--the guy doesn't fly, and he's basically this mean old tank who thinks nothing of crime-busting with his fists....and he's more powerful than a locomotive. I don't think this can work. I don't think you can turn Supes into a Twilight killer, any more than you could turn Smallville into a Buffy killer. See, that's the thing--it's been done before, and it's not a terribly bright idea. I don't get why DC Comics is letting the author do this--revising or reimagining the characters is one thing, but they're putting a _lot_ of ooomph into this like they mean it to stick, when it's a flaky idea.
2016-03-15 00:47:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
new superman?
Is it true that the new superman actor has an enormous penis?
2015-08-11 16:10:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read about this and according to the article, they had to brush off some of his private parts to have or show a normal package instead. Heheh.
2006-07-16 20:40:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by mags 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brandon Routh Penis
2016-10-02 11:27:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by tseng 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree with 1st answerer yu r in wrong section
2006-07-16 20:10:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by dhavalisdhaval 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He doesn't seem to think so
2006-07-16 23:46:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by unclefrunk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
go to another category
2006-07-16 20:27:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your in the wrong section.
2006-07-16 19:56:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by korngoddess1027 5
·
0⤊
0⤋