English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Unless you can prove that you are both the *biological* parents of the child (highly unlikeyl), you can not list 2 women on a birth certificate. It is a record of the child's genetic heritage, not social parents. If you *were* to have an egg of one woman fertilized by the DNA from a cell from another woman, you'd have a case.

2006-07-16 20:23:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This is very, very wrong. It is a lie. If the child came to be by artificial insemination and the sperm came from a sperm bank, then just don't list the father. If the baby is adopted, the child should have the right to know his/her real parents. If the women want to live together and sleep in the same bed and raise the child together, that should be fine unless there is a preexisting relationship between the mother and the father of said child. Then the father should have a say in how the child is raised and what kind of values he/she is exposed to.

But lying on a birth certificate should be illegal and I think it is. The child will be very confused the day they teach him in school, sex education and he discovers that only a man can make a woman pregnant.

2006-07-17 01:56:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 3

Legally, you can only list the biological mother and father on a birth certificate. The woman's partner cannot be listed for obvious reasons.

2006-07-17 02:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by Guppy Geek 5 · 0 1

What is the question? This sounds more like a statement or a comment.

2006-07-17 01:41:59 · answer #4 · answered by jj02 4 · 0 1

This is ridiculous! God never made woman for woman or man for man! He made MAN for WOMAN!

2006-07-17 01:51:05 · answer #5 · answered by tantalizin1 5 · 0 2

What are you trying to say about them??????

2006-07-17 01:45:02 · answer #6 · answered by Breishia B 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers