Unless you can prove that you are both the *biological* parents of the child (highly unlikeyl), you can not list 2 women on a birth certificate. It is a record of the child's genetic heritage, not social parents. If you *were* to have an egg of one woman fertilized by the DNA from a cell from another woman, you'd have a case.
2006-07-16 20:23:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is very, very wrong. It is a lie. If the child came to be by artificial insemination and the sperm came from a sperm bank, then just don't list the father. If the baby is adopted, the child should have the right to know his/her real parents. If the women want to live together and sleep in the same bed and raise the child together, that should be fine unless there is a preexisting relationship between the mother and the father of said child. Then the father should have a say in how the child is raised and what kind of values he/she is exposed to.
But lying on a birth certificate should be illegal and I think it is. The child will be very confused the day they teach him in school, sex education and he discovers that only a man can make a woman pregnant.
2006-07-17 01:56:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Legally, you can only list the biological mother and father on a birth certificate. The woman's partner cannot be listed for obvious reasons.
2006-07-17 02:01:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Guppy Geek 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What is the question? This sounds more like a statement or a comment.
2006-07-17 01:41:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by jj02 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is ridiculous! God never made woman for woman or man for man! He made MAN for WOMAN!
2006-07-17 01:51:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by tantalizin1 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
What are you trying to say about them??????
2006-07-17 01:45:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Breishia B 1
·
0⤊
2⤋