Think of the power[s] he had at his finger tips, being the "Master of Europe" with people doing his biding and the military following his every order. His own people and others scaried of him. He was in a sense, an outcast of society. He didn't fit in, he didn't belong! Yet he lives on though he is dead. Now that's a mutant!!!
2006-07-16 17:39:58 · 10 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hmm, you know I think you're on to something here!
Yep, Hitler was definitely a mutant!
2006-07-16 17:42:50 · answer #1 · answered by Pendergast 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A mutant according to Wikipedia is "an individual, organism, or new genetic character arising or resulting from an instance of mutation, which is a sudden structural change within the DNA of a gene or chromosome of an organism resulting in the creation of a new character or trait not found in the parental type". Hitler was obviously not a mutant, but I could see what your saying, that he was definitely something else. But you are wrong when you say that he was an outcast of society for if he truly were, we wouldn't even know of the name Hitler.
He lives on to this day due to his reign of terror, but for him to have gotten to that point, he took advantage of manipulating the minds of the poor German people during a time of devastation and despair and rallied them to his support. It works easily when the people are desperate and living in degrading conditions, and he gave them an option and vision out which all were willing to take without question. The people may have been scared of him, but most lined the streets to support their new found hero, but it was only in time that their support turned into fear when they had realized the monster, not mutant, that he truly was. By then, it was too late and it was on fate for the oppressed to wait for someone to save and free them, and on April 30th 1945, his reign of terror was over.
2006-07-17 00:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by AzaziL 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi Zorro,
Well, if u understand international politics, U'll feel that his objective was right - to execute Jews, but the way he approached was absurd - killing people. I have a reason for his objective - "WTO has more than 70% jews working in it. More than 2000 people died in 9/11 attack on WTO. None of them were Jews. It was an act of conspiracy." Hitler got his nation not just because of his killing spree but many treated him like God because of his communication skills. So in my terms, for some, he is a legend, for others he is a beast. but not a mutant. Read his book "Meine Kampf", u'll understand why I'm saying this. HAGT.
2006-07-17 00:49:40 · answer #3 · answered by Gee Kay 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mutant. n. An individual, organism, or new genetic character arising or resulting from mutation.
I highly doubt that Hitler's behavior was a result of a chance genetic mutation. Outcast....misfit....and a huge number of other terms, but mutant is not one of them.
2006-07-17 00:48:02 · answer #4 · answered by giovanni9686 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he was, he had the power of persuasion, people listened and they followed him.
2006-07-17 19:46:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
... uh mutant I think is genetic... isn't it...
he was just a good speaker... in the right place at the right time... with no real morals...
2006-07-17 00:45:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! He was simply one of a long list of anti-Christs.
He was nothing more than a terrorist by today's standards.
2006-07-17 01:24:33 · answer #7 · answered by wi_saint 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No that's history of a mentally deranged idiot that should have been assassinated
2006-07-17 01:05:01 · answer #8 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-07-17 00:42:16 · answer #9 · answered by ang 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was an x man
2006-07-17 00:42:53 · answer #10 · answered by St. Anthony of Y!Answers 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋