English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am an equivalence identifiable in any other (what I am not). And, I am a uniqueness distinguishable from any other.

Is this sentence is grammatically correct?

** Sorry for posting these kinds of questions. I am not a native speaker of English.

2006-07-16 17:38:53 · 7 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

7 answers

Correct form - I am more equivalently identifiable person than any other and I am a unique distinguisahable person from any other.

2006-07-16 18:00:07 · answer #1 · answered by K.J. Jeyabaskaran K 3 · 0 1

**Is this sentence grammatically correct?**
vs.
**This sentence is grammatically correct.**

In a question, the verb is moved to the beginning and the rest is just left alone.



**I am an equivalence identifiable in any other (what I am not). And, I am a uniqueness distinguishable from any other.**

I assume the "(what I am not)" will be replaced with some word. If it is, then I think the sentences are grammatically correct, but they will probably confuse a few people if you want to use them.

Try something more like:
"I am easily identifiable in any [group of things not you], and I am unique from them."

Changes I made:
1. "an equivalence" --> "easily" goes from a noun to an adjective, and presents your idea more clearly.

2. ". And, " --> ", and" forms a single sentence, which sounds a little better.

3. "a uniqueness distinguishable" --> "unique" again goes from a noun to an adjective, and clears up some of the redundancy of your version.

4. "from any other" --> " them" replaces what you already said with a pronoun to sound a little better.


I think you are doing a super job with English. With some practice and time spent either in an English speaking country or just watching television programs in English you could probably pick up on a lot.

I took Spanish classes for 4 years and failed miserably at it, so good luck!

2006-07-17 00:54:49 · answer #2 · answered by wdmc 4 · 0 0

Not sure what you're saying...makes no sense to me.

But mostly GRAMMATICALLY correct. However you do not need a comma after And in the second sentence. Conjunctions typically do not need a comma after them.

However it's often not considered "good form" to begin a sentence with a conjunction--although some style manuals will allow it.

2006-07-17 00:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by keyz 4 · 0 0

I don't understand what you're trying to say in the sentences.

Maybe the second one should be "I am unique and distinguishable from any other."

2006-07-17 00:42:25 · answer #4 · answered by cucumberlarry1 6 · 0 0

The question should be is this sentence grammatically correct and you were so close.

2006-07-17 00:42:08 · answer #5 · answered by Sophia 4 · 0 0

No, for many reasons. For one thing, unique means one of a kind, so the way you worded it renders it redundant, and quite frankly, poppycock.

2006-07-17 00:48:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that ain't english! that's swahili!

2006-07-17 00:41:45 · answer #7 · answered by St. Anthony of Y!Answers 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers