How long should a person that has been committed of a crime of murder be allowed to stay alive in the prison. So that tax payers like us have to support these inmates sometimes as long as 10, 15, and 20 years. I personnally think there should be a 72 hour turn around when there is 100% proof that this person committed the crime.
2006-07-16 16:34:47 · 10 answers · asked by ZigZag 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I Know it! I am appalled at the fact that me and my husband who work hard and have never broken the law can't even get damn medical or dental for us or even our infant daughter through our state who *** rapes us for tax money but convicts get cosmetic work done (mostly dental) every day! What the F%$# is up with that? Oh poor them, they did drugs so much that their teeth are all falling out and look like a batch of baked beans when they smile, but hey, lets pay for their dental work, F%$# the hardworking law abiding citizens!!! This really pisses me off, it's almost like your better off just being a F%$#ing jail bird, hell there's more benefits!
2006-07-16 16:44:31 · answer #1 · answered by mother_flower 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of it somewhat is ethical. The positives could be - there's a great pool of persons to aim on. yet another helpful could be that inmates stay in an fairly controlled environment, so that is not likely alcohol or different drugs could be recent to intervene with the outcomes. The negatives could be - the inmates must be compelled or coerced into partaking. Human testing comes with unfavourable aspects - i do no longer think of prisons are set as much as cope with the testing or the component outcomes.
2016-12-10 08:30:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there is 100% proof that they commited the murder I would agree that they should be put to death in a rather shorter time period. With 100% proof it should only be a few days.
2006-07-16 16:38:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take a tip from the Chinese and take them round the back of the court house after the final hearing/appeal and stick a bullet through their heads.
Its serves no purpose other than the lawyer's to keep a person on death row (even when they admitted guilt) for 10,15,20 years.
2006-07-16 17:20:43 · answer #4 · answered by stefjeff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Inmates sentenced to death should be executed the soonest upon the finality of the death sentence when a decision was made by the Supreme Court.
2006-07-16 16:39:03 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, some people on death row sit for like 20 years and thats more time on this earth than the person they murdered got.
2006-07-16 16:45:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Because you know they probably didn't take but a couple of seconds before they knew what they were gonna do.
2006-07-16 16:40:00 · answer #7 · answered by T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm tired of paying $80-90,000 p/yr to house them!
Where's MY $80-90,000 p/yr for being good?
Whack'em!
2006-07-16 18:29:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree, if we know they did it and they got the sentence, no need to waste time and money on them.
2006-07-16 16:39:13 · answer #9 · answered by James P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eh, whatever...
Kill em, dont kill em.. doesnt matter.. There will be 10 more to replace him thanks to our welfare system,drug use,decaying values and gang activities.
2006-07-16 16:40:00 · answer #10 · answered by profit0004 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋