2006-07-16 16:16:02 · 35 answers · asked by oro_veritis 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dumb & Dumber...
2006-07-16 16:17:56 · update #1
Regan had the beginnings of Alheizmers. Bush is just out for Bush, his interests, and his cronies.
2006-07-16 16:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush. A movie star shouldn't have been elected anyway. What would John Wayne know about dealing with matters on a level that doesn't include a revolver and walking 20 paces? As for Bush, he's just been getting worse since getting into the Oval Office. His decisions are showing to rip the United States into shreds. Need I state, a corrupted Office, a war for oil, a terrorist at large, a country arming itself for nuclear attack and all Bush and the conservatives can whine about is how it's the ragheads fault and the solution is taking away gay rights. Rey-Gun didn't know better, but Bush has no excuse.
2006-07-16 20:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say that Bush is dumber for wanting to run after Clinton was in office. Between Clinton's bad Presidency and Gore running to the Supreme Court to win a Presidential election, Bush did not have a chance. Al Qiada was waiting for just this time to attack the US. Remember that Clinton was handed Bin Laden on a silver platter and he let him go. Reagan was so smart that the Iranians did not want to tangle with him. He also gave Russia the push needed to free Eastern Europe and Russia from Communism.
2006-07-16 16:25:03 · answer #3 · answered by andy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You got it , Reagan was dumb and Bush is dumber
2006-07-16 17:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know it's bad when it's the smarter of the two (Reagan) who thought that we could use Star Wars strategies to defend our country from the Russians.
So Bush must be really dumb. At least Reagan really did care about people.
2006-07-16 16:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by rebekkah hot as the sun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, believe me when I tell you that your perception of people in the media usually has very little to do with reality. I agree with very few policies or decisions of Reagan or Bush, but really, you do not get to be president without being smart. It just doesn't happen. It can't happen. The amount of power-brokering and deal-making just can't be done by someone who isn't, at the very least, of above average intelligence.
If dumb people can be president, why aren't you president?
2006-07-16 16:22:01 · answer #6 · answered by yoki 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dumb and Dumber,,,
Reagan - Iran Contra
2006-07-16 16:19:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is clearly dumber
2006-07-16 16:19:01 · answer #8 · answered by abby0619 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, Dubya. Reagan was an actor, so why was he credible in the first place. And he had Alzheimers! So this is how I put it: For a b-movie actor wtih Alzheimers, Reagan was VERY smart, while for an coke-snorting, alcoholic, local dummy, Bush is still extremely stupid.
2006-07-16 16:32:50 · answer #9 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush. Reagan wasn't too bright, either, but he had I think good intentions. Bush is just a front man for the Cheney regime.
2006-07-16 16:29:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither but you are and so is your stupid question. Can you liberals never stop bashing Bush and now speaking ill of a great leader and a man who has passed? Is this really what your life is surrounded by? I'm a happy person and I'm glad I have better things to do with my life. To me all this rhetoric is disgraceful and un American and I disagree with anything that is regardless of political affiliation. Please move on to more intelligent questions if you can.
2006-07-16 16:37:05 · answer #11 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋