I would guess that we have a couple of generations of brand new terrorists for which we can thank Bush.
We are likely to have troops in Iraq for at least ten more years. The total cost of Iraq will probably end up around 2 trillion dollars, it is up to about 450 billion already.
These are the least of his sins.
2006-07-16 16:13:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Engineer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
?????? I hate these hazy, unfocused, questions.
Years squandered? They Put a new Govn't in Afganistain. They are building a democratic Iraq in a sea of monarchies & dictatorships. They got Libya to give up terrorism. Syria was forced out of Lebanon. A elected leader is trying to fix Haiti finally. A pro American government was elected in Mexico. China and the US is working on the North Korea problem together with Japan. India and Pakistan have a shaky peace thanks to us. Indonesia and the rest of SE Asia saw our helping hand after the tsunami showing we don't just blow up people. We will make nice with Cuba when Castro dies. As far as Europe goes, Nato is in Afganistan and many nations are helping in Iraq. So what more do you want?????
2006-07-16 23:30:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by lana_sands 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to get your facts straight. Under the previous Admin (Democrats and Clinton) World Peace was none the better. If anything the Dems made us look like a sitting Duck. We made two halfhearted attempts at getting Bin Laden after he bombed our embassies in Africa and what about the first trade center attack? They caught some blind old mouth piece and barely convicted him. During Clinton World terrorists groups attacks quadrupled.
Under Clinton we had :
Kidnappings of U.S. Citizens in Colombia, January 31, 1993:
World Trade Center Bombing, February 26, 1993:
Attempted Assassination of President Bush by Iraqi Agents, April 14, 1993:
Attack on U.S. Diplomats in Pakistan, March 8, 1995:
Bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995:
Attack on U.S. Embassy in Moscow, September 13, 1995:
Khobar Towers Bombing, June 25, 1996: A fuel truck carrying a bomb exploded outside the US military's Khobar Towers housing facility in Dhahran, killing 19 U.S. military personnel and wounding 515 persons, including 240 U.S. personnel.
Empire State Building Sniper Attack, February 23, 1997:
U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa, August 7, 1998:
These are just some note worthy ones.
2006-07-16 23:19:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you rake up so many points in one week?
Where did you find a reference that Bush went to war "in the name of Peace?"
I believe Bush went to War in an attempt to bring Democracy to the Middle East - but he failed to foresee the Insurgency. Now Iran, Syria, and North Korea are pulling feathers out of the Eagle. Ugh!!
2006-07-16 23:18:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by fatsausage 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
5. I'd say 5 years. At most, anyhow.
Pretty much from when we invaded Iraq on, that's when the squandering began.
2006-07-16 23:11:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by AnAugustHand 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will be AT LEAST the eight years of their in-office debacle when the Bush bunglers are done screwing up.
I'm sure if there were an airlift (like Viet Nam), "compassionate conservative" Bush would make sure that NO Iraqis who were loyal Green Zone/embassy employees, and thus subject to reprisal, would be allowed to evacuate with us. The reason?....:
Y'all know, 'cause them thar Mooslims ain't good Gawd-fearin' Kristens like we-ins is.
2006-07-17 17:00:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Easy does it doll. Bush is truly a bumpkin but... there was not, at any time 'peace' before George W. was what he is, and.... there will not be any peace after his terminal term expires. That is just known as the American Global Manifest Destiny - your new neo-fascist movement that has no time for non-compliance.
2006-07-16 23:19:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what peace, not much peace in this world anymore maybe the occassional community but every where you look peace is diminishing sad but true
2006-07-16 23:16:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by steve e 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 trillion billion million
2006-07-16 23:19:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by 2 hot 2 handle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is the dumbest, most senseless, illiterate question I have ever seen
2006-07-16 23:35:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by john m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋